Residential proxies detected on White House network

(layer3intel.com)

230 points | by Rasbora an hour ago ago

62 comments

  • btown 40 minutes ago

    The danger here, of course, is that while these compromised devices are currently being monetized in a relatively benign way (other than bandwidth costs to the user, which to be sure can be nontrivial)… it would be naive to assume that there isn't a Command and Control capability that can assign less benign tasking - or can be compromised to do so.

    This also puts some of the troubling reports that politicians were bringing phones into SCIFs into context…

    • mzajc 12 minutes ago

      > benign

      On a server that used to get below 1k HTTP requests a day, I've had several cases of mass scraping from these botnets exceeding 100req/s. The web is getting harder and harder to use due to all the anti-bot mechanisms site operators had to put up.

      How is DDOSing every site on the web benign?

      • nucleardog 8 minutes ago

        Relatively benign.

        A compromised device inside the White House network could presumably be doing something _much_ worse than participating in a DDOS against random websites.

    • lesuorac 36 minutes ago

      > This also puts some of the troubling reports that politicians were bringing phones into SCIFs into context…

      I mean politicians are so addicted to twitter the nsa makes special phones…

  • bronco21016 an hour ago

    Gotta have your SuperBox set up to watch 24 hr cable news working late into the night.

    • JTbane 37 minutes ago

      I have seen these at mall kiosks advertising "free cable", and today I learned they are proxying from your home network.

    • thehodge an hour ago

      That was the first thing I thought of!

  • j2kun 18 minutes ago

    Out of curiosity, how would I check my own device for a residential proxy?

  • lakeviewterrace 11 minutes ago

    So they don't actually know what this network is, just who owns the IP space... time for a blog post to advertise our week-old service!

    There is no evidence that physically ties this to the WH. It could be in a security lab for all they know. Or a guest network for the news media.

    • 1e1a a minute ago

      Perhaps ping time measurements could help identify where the devices are physically located.

  • anpat 28 minutes ago

    How would one detect this on their home network and protect themselves from?

    • blacksmith_tb 22 minutes ago

      Step one, find your public IP, I like ipinfo.io but there are many other services that will show it. Then pop it into a tool like the one that's hosting TFA[1]

      1: https://layer3intel.com/context

    • EvanAnderson 19 minutes ago

      Unexpected traffic would be the biggest gross red flag. If it constrains itself to moving traffic when it's otherwise perform its desired function (if it's one of those "free TV" boxes and it only proxies when you're playing video) it might be hard to tease-out the unwanted traffic purely looking at bytes in/out.

      Beyond that gross metric you're getting into capturing traffic and decoding it.

    • tom1337 21 minutes ago

      Check network traffic from smart devices would be a good start. If your TV does gigabytes of traffic in the night when you don’t use it, it most likely is acting as a residential proxy.

  • vanyle 41 minutes ago

    Residential proxies are a very important part of the internet, they allow scraping for archiving, automation and can be used for extra anonymity.

    While they have grown a bit too much, they are a natural response to the absurd amount of effort every website is pouring into anti-scraping tech.

    • 10111001 33 minutes ago

      > Residential proxies are a very important part of the internet, they allow scraping for archiving, automation and can be used for extra anonymity.

      Aren't they almost always run unknowingly, by people tricked into running them?

      • dabbz 16 minutes ago

        There exist services that will pay you a fraction of money to host their residential proxy service on a computer you own. But I do think the majority of residential proxies are hijacked.

    • xyzzy_plugh 33 minutes ago

      Leveraging compromised devices is a very important part of the Internet??? This is an incredibly twisted perspective.

      Help me understand. As far as I'm aware, these residential proxies are almost always malware.

    • lakeviewterrace 23 minutes ago

      "Malware is an important part of the Internet"

      > and can be used for extra anonymity

      Great, so you can conduct illegal transactions and have some unsuspecting grandma take the blame and have her front door kicked in?

    • georgel 39 minutes ago

      I wouldn't call turning on CloudFlare's bot blocker an "absurd amount of effort" from the perspective of site owners.

      But getting around it sure is annoying, sometimes I get flagged IP's from Comcast and can't visit sites like costco.com despite not doing any questionable stuff on my network.

    • mikestew 7 minutes ago

      Residential proxies are a very important part of the internet

      So important that we have to trick people into using them. Remember when folks were running SETI@Home? Of course you do, because it was widely thought to be a good thing, and folks willingly signed up.

      How many would buy the "box" if the advertising were honest about what's actually in the box?

    • benjojo12 28 minutes ago

      Did a residential proxy provider write this

      • lakeviewterrace 8 minutes ago

        Huh, and I wonder why I've been getting tons of "you might be a bot" CAPTCHA challenges from Google lately.

      • mcmcmc 25 minutes ago

        Frontier lab training data “collector”

    • OptionX 22 minutes ago

      And making DDoS-attacks nigh impossible to IP block.

      Residential proxies are in many cases at least shady, both on the side of who uses them and for what and on providers that are often not above using dark pattern to hide them in some innocuous app for a smart-whatever that silently runs a proxy on a unaware user's connection. And in many places in the world if illegal stuff in done using your connection you are liable, regardless if you knew about it.

    • mcmcmc 26 minutes ago

      Hard disagree. They are malware 99.9% of the time. The utility does not erase the fact they are abusive.

    • mzajc 6 minutes ago

      s/Residential proxies/DDoS networks/, then re-read your comment.

    • Bender 33 minutes ago

      Most tools can be dual-use. Residential proxies are also used by malevolent actors to hack infrastructure or financial institutions and let some other poor soul get investigated for it. This is why we can't have nice things.

      • kube-system 23 minutes ago

        They're also used by the good guys who are going after those exact same bad guys.

        • Bender 9 minutes ago

          True, though unfortunately people can not be trusted to declare their intentions so the residential proxies will ultimately have to be sacrificed and given they are fairly easy to identify by behavior I could foresee the feds now having a reason to round 'em up faster. They already took out NetNut, IPIDEA, SocksEscort, Doppellganger and the "Kim Wolf" Offshoots.

    • sparkling 36 minutes ago

      >absurd amount of effort every website is pouring into anti-scraping tech.

      Maybe some people do not want to provide their entire website as free training material to [insert LLM lab here]?

    • squidmaster 35 minutes ago

      Virtually all of it is the product of malware. This is like you saying that robbery is very important because you like buying cheap tools at pawnshops.

  • 18 minutes ago
    [deleted]
  • opengrass 15 minutes ago

    NSA honeypots

  • jefurii 10 minutes ago

    But her e-mail server!

  • 15 minutes ago
    [deleted]
  • mongrelion 44 minutes ago

    What is a residential proxy?

    • ZoneZealot 36 minutes ago

      It's described at a high level in media often. Here's more detail though:

      Person buys a product, or downloads some software - that unknowing to them, was reaching out to a central server elsewhere to establish a network tunnel. And over that tunnel, the other server routes traffic onto that person's home network. Which can then of course go onto the internet, and it appears like the traffic originated from their home internet connection.

      Other people rent access to this network. The goal being, you have surreptitious access to appear as any one of tens of thousands of home network IP addresses on the public internet. Bad guys can use this to rotate through many different IP addresses when their access gets blocked because of malicious (or benign but unwanted) behavior on the internet. Residential IP addresses are more 'valuable' because they don't have the negative connotation that datacentre and commercial IPs can have, and they can be spread geographically or across many ISPs.

      A very common way for people being a part of these residential proxy networks is by buying dodgy streaming boxes, and also installing shady apps on TV app marketplaces.

      • superjan 23 minutes ago

        I was expecting that VPN’s (maybe not all) also use their own customers as relays, but you don’t mention them. Am I wrong?

    • dormento 41 minutes ago

      It means some networked devices in there are being remotely piloted to tunnel network traffic to somewhere else. This scenario usually happens with more "unprofessional" ISPs, which sell bandwidth from their networked clients for people in need of such services.

      Such as ignoring web scraping countermeasures, and DDoS.

    • georgel 41 minutes ago

      There are companies that provide proxy services for scraping services, and residential proxies route through consumer networks (like Comcast) which is flagged less than a datacenter IP.

      Many questionable TV streaming boxes pretend to deliver you video, but in reality they are also piggy backing on your personal ISP to power those companies.

    • RKearney 42 minutes ago

      The 4th sentence in the article has a link to What is a Residential Proxy?[0]

      [0]: https://layer3intel.com/what-is-a-residential-proxy

    • duiker101 42 minutes ago

      From the article:

      > Residential proxy services sell access to everyday devices, letting customers send traffic through them so it appears to come from that device's network.

    • 2OEH8eoCRo0 39 minutes ago

      Essentially lets bad actors use your home network.

    • whalesalad 41 minutes ago

      There are services you can pay for such that you can route internet traffic thru a specific IP in a specific part of the world. People (usually unwillingly and unknowingly) run software that effectively makes them part of a giant botnet. A computer running in Romania might have some kind of weather application or gambling/casino app that I could use to make an HTTP request as if I were on their network. So if you need access to 1,000 or 10,000 IP's to circumvent rate limits or perform crawling tasks, this is how you could do it.

    • gessha 43 minutes ago

      Second paragraph

  • 09712306130 40 minutes ago

    Seems like the president found a business opportunity and gave internal orders to rent out the network infrastructure to 'ethically sourced' providers :^) Jokes aside, might be some infected IoT crap.

    I buy and use residential proxies, though.

  • Bassiestroep an hour ago

    I mean supply chain-attacks are everywhere. Smart-TV's with certain marketplace apps, IoT devices. Also, I'm surprised the white house's network is not monitored more.

  • spiderfarmer an hour ago

    That is not an environment for serious people anymore so that's expected.

  • bashhq_r an hour ago

    [dead]

  • tonetheman 41 minutes ago

    [dead]

  • Pissenschaftlom 30 minutes ago

    [flagged]

  • JudahNyquist 37 minutes ago

    probably something IOT with a vulnerability, happens all the time.

  • sfmike an hour ago

    Vibe coders really having fun on their side quests these days