3 comments

  • JohnMakin 5 hours ago

    It's like people en masse are discovering OAuth standard for the first time.

    • Betelbuddy an hour ago

      Yes OAuth ....

      "At the end, I reached the conclusion that OAuth 2.0 is a bad protocol. WS-* bad. It is bad enough that I no longer want to be associated with it. It is the biggest professional disappointment of my career.”

         - Eran Hammer, lead author and editor of OAuth 2.0 spec
      
      "All the hard fought compromises on the mailing list, in meetings, in special design committees, and in back channels resulted in a specification that fails to deliver its two main goals – security and interoperability."

         - Eran Hammer, lead author and editor of OAuth 2.0 spec
  • foolswisdom 6 hours ago

    > It does not stop a determined social engineer

    In the age of people trying AI for everything and occasionally following instructions the trustworthiness they cannot judge, that's probably the biggest problem. From a security perspective, the lethal trifecta is alive and well.

    A commercial customer will lock down their mcps (requiring approval by an admin), and there it may make sense to allow adding custom mcp servers. But for consumer accounts, not allowing arbitrary mcps is a conservative move. Though honestly given how the AI labs operate, it's surprising to me that they're not looser with restrictions in the name of more engagement.