I guess I have two thoughts that spring to mind regarding this;
A) why?
B) they can't. Because XP is not like some notepad app someone wrote. Rather it is a collection of software, a lot of it owned by not-microsoft and licensed to them. And that's before we talk about the security implications to existing systems still running XP.
Thirdly, what possible benefit could they get for doing this? I can see plenty of down-sides, including some very large potential economic and legal downsides. But I can't think of an upside.
I guess I have two thoughts that spring to mind regarding this;
A) why?
B) they can't. Because XP is not like some notepad app someone wrote. Rather it is a collection of software, a lot of it owned by not-microsoft and licensed to them. And that's before we talk about the security implications to existing systems still running XP.
Thirdly, what possible benefit could they get for doing this? I can see plenty of down-sides, including some very large potential economic and legal downsides. But I can't think of an upside.
"And that's before we talk about the security implications to existing systems still running XP."
And subsequent systems still using some of that code
https://github.com/DeDf/winxp_source
Knowing that Github is owned by Microsoft, they probably are fine with it.
And I'd like to request 5 billion dollars be transferred to my account
Windows is continuously developed, and many parts of it changed very little between XP and 11. Not going to happen.
ReactOS already exists and targets the API level as XP. You can even install the same Luna theme that XP used to make it look like XP.
Download any windows installtion on The internet
Lets say that I am Microsoft:
Why?
... this leaked 6 years ago?