4y5k, have some self-respect. you could have cooked on this for a little bit longer than: yesterday. there is one commit! this is ... quite possibly, but I'm unsure, the first "show hn" with a single commit, lol
Posting works well for making outbound HTTP requests; the only part it doesn't handle by default is locally capturing and replaying webhooks.
While testing TradingView alerts, exchange execution callback handlers, or cryptocurrency payment webhooks for our trading software, we always find ourselves running `posting` (or `curl`) in one terminal window while having an additional tunneling/receiving script running in another one just to catch and retransmit the tricky JSON payloads.
Feels odd to me to put TUI in the about section first, and then a few words later use no electron as a selling point - if I’m using a TUI I’m not expecting electron!
I don't see it the same way. People are building these things for themselves because it solves a specific problem they have, and that means it's crafted just to their liking. And it will only become easier to maintain these because of LLMs constantly advancing (for now). So if this is also a match for what you want out of a tool, then you can easily adopt it, or even fork it to your own liking. If it's not a fit for you, that's fine, there are plenty other options that may be.
4y5k, have some self-respect. you could have cooked on this for a little bit longer than: yesterday. there is one commit! this is ... quite possibly, but I'm unsure, the first "show hn" with a single commit, lol
Why does it matter. It's pretty normal to do a bunch of dev locally and then at some point create a public gh repo and then push
Without having looked to deeply into this..why?
https://github.com/darrenburns/posting
Exists, its from on of the co-devs of textual the framework this uses anyway..and more mature I would wager to say.
Posting works well for making outbound HTTP requests; the only part it doesn't handle by default is locally capturing and replaying webhooks.
While testing TradingView alerts, exchange execution callback handlers, or cryptocurrency payment webhooks for our trading software, we always find ourselves running `posting` (or `curl`) in one terminal window while having an additional tunneling/receiving script running in another one just to catch and retransmit the tricky JSON payloads.
Is it weird that in 2027 I get excited by apps becoming TUIs?
Would love to see OpenAPI support at least for import
Welcome, future person! Please give us good news about what will transpire since many of us are currently stuck on Halloween 2026. Thanks!
Feels odd to me to put TUI in the about section first, and then a few words later use no electron as a selling point - if I’m using a TUI I’m not expecting electron!
[delayed]
I mean this is clearly unfinished and was certainly vibe-coded literally yesterday.
> No cloud accounts. No 1GB Electron bloat. 100% Local-first.
This would make me want to use Postman (Electron) over this, since I know that this will absolutely be unmaintained in the a few years.
I don't see it the same way. People are building these things for themselves because it solves a specific problem they have, and that means it's crafted just to their liking. And it will only become easier to maintain these because of LLMs constantly advancing (for now). So if this is also a match for what you want out of a tool, then you can easily adopt it, or even fork it to your own liking. If it's not a fit for you, that's fine, there are plenty other options that may be.