24 comments

  • jacquesm 2 hours ago

    Four days ago.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50236455

    This kind of thing will be as regular as clockwork in a few years time. Still there are a lot of people that will simply not believe it.

    • adriand 42 minutes ago

      The deniers have transitioned to doomers. Originally they said we needn’t fight climate change because it wasn’t real. Now that’s it’s undeniable they say we can’t fight climate change because it’s too late.

      • taneq 27 minutes ago

        “We’re going to follow the Four Stage Strategy.”

      • conception 33 minutes ago

        That’s because the ultra wealthy are funding new talking points.

    • echelon 2 hours ago

      The people you think don't believe it do believe it. They use it as a statistic.

      I live in the Southeast and hear the "guns in America kill fewer people than lack of AC in Europe" line all the time.

      The battle is "not my problem", not "that's not happening".

      • jimt1234 2 hours ago

        The line I hear all the time is: "Why do I care if sea levels rise a couple of inches? I don't own a house on the beach!"

        • ctkhn 2 hours ago

          The craziest to me is the people who do own houses on the beach who want the government to bail them out. Even without El Nino or climate change, that's a hazardous location. Do not ask for my insurance or tax dollars to (literally) bail you out!

          • bathtub365 14 minutes ago

            Why shouldn’t insurance cover it if it’s in their policy?

          • lazide an hour ago

            If they might convince some fool to do it, they’d be fools not too eh?

            That’s a lot of money!

  • skyberrys 22 minutes ago

    The tides are really high right now. It's very obvious that the water is much higher than usual. Can't wait until it starts raining on me more than usual too... I'll have extra water from both directions.

  • nusoone 10 minutes ago

    Way too much fresh water, won’t be able to keep draining the Colorado river

  • rationalist 2 hours ago

    I remember when Gizmodo just posted cool technology stuff. I even had my stuff featured on their website a couple of times.

    Edit: I haven't been on Gizmodo for a long time. Do they also have a rule saying you can't criticize them?

    This inspired me to checkout Hackaday again. Thankfully they still just post cool tech stuff (even after they sold the website a few years back). I'm not cool enough to have my stuff featured on HAD though lol.

    • Aachen 35 minutes ago

      I didn't vote on your comment but consider that people might just find the comment nonconstructive or uninteresting (which is what the guidelines say to base votes on) rather than that there is a "rule against criticising Gizmodo"

    • dghlsakjg an hour ago

      Like so much in today’s world, this is kinda Peter thiel’s fault.

      He bankrolled the Hulk Hogan lawsuit against Gawker as revenge because they reported on him being gay. The judgement forced gawker into bankruptcy where it was scooped up by private equity. The new managers gutted the place and forced the writers and editors to publish clickbait garbage instead of doing journalism.

      That’s why Gizmodo looks nothing like what you remember.

      • justinhj 32 minutes ago

        Journalism like publishing private sexual encounters that were secretly recorded and called it news?

        • 0c3ca83 11 minutes ago

          I forgot that freedom of the press only applies when you personally approve of what they're printing.

  • redanddead 35 minutes ago

    RIP insurance industry

    • Ralfp 33 minutes ago

      Don't worry, most of those plans don't even cover floods.

  • xiaoyu2006 3 hours ago

    I am in OC and newport beach really suffered...

    • gumby 2 hours ago

      A lot of Bay Area folks thought they were immune

  • bilsbie 2 hours ago

    This is more likely to be climate change related. It’s climate denial to try blaming it on El Niño.

    • tmnvix 2 hours ago

      I think a common view is that the strength (and possibly frequency?) of El Niño is a symptom of climate change.

      • czinck 35 minutes ago

        Yes, several studies have concluded that climate change is making both El Niño and La Niña stronger, and making the switch between them quicker. And "stronger" here just means the temperature difference. Climate change is also raising the baseline temperature, so the actual effects of an El Niño of a given temperature difference (which this year is already the biggest on record and climbing) is expected to be worse.

    • georgemcbay an hour ago

      > This is more likely to be climate change related. It’s climate denial to try blaming it on El Niño.

      It is entirely related to both and I'm pretty sure Gizmodo isn't trying to project blame away from climate change here.

      Climate change is making unusually adverse weather events more common in general. El Niño is a cyclical event that results in an increase in adverse weather events from whatever the current baseline is.

      As climate change worsens things on average, it'll worsen things even more when combined with amplification events like El Niño.