43 comments

  • oefrha 2 hours ago

    IMO a font specimen site may be the worst place to use font-display: swap. Was wondering why I was looking at what seemed indistinguishable from Courier, turns out what I saw was exactly Courier.

  • jve 8 minutes ago

    Is it only me but I really dislike "Code Ligations"? I have to mark some chars to count how many consecutive "=" simbols there are... or \/ looking like V without having other chars near it to distinguish. Having to copy paste diamond shape to find out it is <>. arrows with squiggly tails, /> being ugly, <. having dot in the middle...

    That could be the maximum I'd like out of font to have "proper" greater/less-equal sign.

    • slazaro 3 minutes ago

      They always seemed to me like solutions to a nonexistent problem. They make the code less readable, but ligatures exist and they seemed like a cool tech thing to implement, and they might look cool in screenshots. But in practice, in my opinion, they're worse than just having the normal characters. But I guess it's a matter of opinion, no harm in other people using them.

    • semiquaver 5 minutes ago

      ligatures, not ligations

  • wartywhoa23 an hour ago

    Iosevka, my absolutely most loved font for years!

    I've been using a custom version - you can customize the font¹ and build your own ttf (or better yet, ttc) using the build system supplied in the repository².

    be5invis, the author of the font, deserves a special mention for creating a whole custom DSL called PatEL (Parametric Type Expression Language) to generate the font programmatically!

    Renzhi, if you ever come around to read this, thank you so much for Iosevka, man!

    ¹https://typeof.net/Iosevka/customizer

    ²https://github.com/be5invis/Iosevka/blob/master/doc/custom-b...

    • JdeBP 28 minutes ago

      That explains all of the .ptl source files, which I didn't recognize straightaway.

    • nextaccountic 44 minutes ago

      > ttf (or better yet, ttc)

      Why is ttc better?

      • wartywhoa23 38 minutes ago

        It's a package of ttfs, simpler to have all in one file on disk as well as install from one. Customization can generate a lot of font varieties.

  • jwr 10 minutes ago

    This is the best font I have ever found, and I have tried a lot of them over the years. The ability to specify your own variations and generate your own fonts is really useful. I am a big fan of the dotted zero, for example.

    The readability is excellent, and this font replaced everything else that I tried before. Highly recommended!

  • miqkt an hour ago

    My go-to monospace font in everything I use nowadays. Way back, it used to be JetBrains Mono. When I decided to give Iosevka a try, I actually started with the expanded variant, because I wasn't accustomed to the narrow jump. Took a while, but at some point I took that jump back to the default and it's stuck. Thanks for your efforts on this font Renzhi!

  • TwoFerMaggie 2 hours ago

    Have been using it for a couple years. Before that I was using Fira Code/Mono which was also fantastic. However, once I got used to the condensed Iosevka, all the other fonts just felt loose and not space efficient enough in my IDE and terminal.

    • aziis98 2 hours ago

      Exactly the same for me! I love it for the terminal especially

  • GCUMstlyHarmls 22 minutes ago

    First time I used Iosevka I felt really nauseated, kind of like getting motion sickness, it was a really bizarre experience for a font to give me. I was on a smaller screen though and getting some more characters in without getting tiny was actually a selling point, so I gave it another go and eventually got over the feeling.

    Now (after ... gosh, 6, 7, 8? years probably) I love it, use it everywhere and other monospace font feels super w i d e and weird.

  • JdeBP 34 minutes ago

    It is interesting that it differentiates between oblique and italic, something that not many fonts aimed at the monospace crowd do, in both the English and Cyrillic alphabets. The list of variants for the letter k is longer than I expected.

    Alas, it is oblong, not square.

    And 7 thousand-odd code points is not as large a range as it used to be a couple of decades ago. That said, it does have MouseText, the 7-segment LED digits, and suchlike from the Supplementary Plane 1.

  • sgarrity 7 minutes ago

    What does “quasi-proportional” mean?

  • fenprace 29 minutes ago

    I ve been using iosevka for 5+ years. Iosevka Extended is my go-t mono font. It's just clean and cool.

    One thing I definitely love is it's easy to access. It has been packed for many package managers. I can just brew install or yay -S to get it.

  • rf15 an hour ago

    Good to know that the age old tradition of calling a font with serifs sans-serif is well alive and kicking.

    The reason here is that the basic glyph shape is that of a sans-serif, but still got serifs added afterwards. That doesn't stop it from diluting the meaning of the term.

    • wartywhoa23 an hour ago

      Iosevka can perfectly be either sans-serif, or serif, or a mixture - it's customizable.

  • nitinreddy88 40 minutes ago

    Once we use Berkeley mono font, we will never switch to another one :)

    Whenever font discussions come up, I will try everyones suggestions to find better than what I have, and always came back to Berkeley. Its almost near perfect for coding!

  • allumik 44 minutes ago

    Used Iosevka for a while, now fully on Aporetic for everything monospace. Something about the thin and tall serif just clicks with me, and Aporetic seemed to work better size wise for my terminals and GUIs.

    • wartywhoa23 34 minutes ago

      That's still Iosevka though, just a custom build.

  • weinzierl an hour ago

    It also has many weights. In my opinion it's one of the best monospaced fonts where you actually can use weight as an additional dimension in syntax highlighting.

  • starquake 40 minutes ago

    The default font since GNOME 48 is Adwaita Sans (a modified Inter with different l's and I's) and for monospace it is Adwaita Mono (a modified Iosevka.)

    I like it a lot!

  • cik an hour ago

    I have been using this font for 3 years now. I can't, and won't get off it. I use it wherever I can - heck there's an Arch package! I'm pleasantly surprised by how much something this simple makes me happy. Legitimately a font has added to my life.

    • slow_typist an hour ago

      Thanks, I couldn’t spot a license on the website, but existence of an arch package does probably mean the license is okayish.

      • JdeBP 31 minutes ago

        Go and read the source code on the GitHub repository that the page links to as "Downloads". There's a LICENSE.md there, and a fair amount besides.

  • gadrev an hour ago

    Nice one. I used it for some years, mostly in urxvt.

    Some time ago I switched to wayland/sway/foot, and I'm on 0xProtoNerdFont, quite pleasant as well.

  • exwireXI 35 minutes ago

    I've been using Iosevka(custom) and loved it since then.

  • sho_hn an hour ago

    Iosevka Fixed Curly is also my favorite font to code and terminal in.

  • dizhn 26 minutes ago

    It's a google score thing right. That the first font that loads is not their font on a font page?

  • bowsamic an hour ago

    I felt like my eyes hurt when I tried this font. It's hard for me to switch away from the standard width monospace fonts. At the moment I use Commit Mono. Extra horizontal space might be nice but it's not worth risking any discomfort

  • orphereus 2 hours ago

    Does tsoding use this font?

  • IceDane 2 hours ago

    I occasionally try to find a nicer font than Iosevka, but none of them stick and I always go back.

    • Diti 22 minutes ago

      Pragmata Pro. The font Iosevka is based on.

    • nerdypepper an hour ago

      input.djr.com, haven't used a different font in many years!

    • triggis an hour ago

      What about Maple Mono?

      • gpessia 34 minutes ago

        love Maple Mono!