35 comments

  • K0balt 27 minutes ago

    These are going to be so awesome to buy in 5-8 years!

    Right now I’m running 2x 3090 and 128 gb ram on 3.8 flash-next180b (the quant is 97gb) and it hums at120t/s. It’s really a surprisingly good model for general tasks, and I’m soon to see how it does with more agentic kit. For agentic work it does slow down quite a bit when the context fills up… but what do you want for running a 180b model on consumer hardware?

    Right now I have it set up as an administrator for our asterisk PBX and radius server, and it does higher level judgment on our cctv footage for notifications to security. It’s been really good so far. Agents are the new UI, everything just works over SSH now.

  • ismailmaj 11 minutes ago

    1.5 TB/s 1.3 PFLOPS with no fast multi-GPU, it's a consumer card that pretends to be a server card.

    It would work great on Qwen3.8-Flash-Next or GLM-5.3 as single user decode only hits a few experts, anything with concurrent users and you'd be sitting for a while.

  • suprjami an hour ago

    With an impressive 1.5TB/s RAM bandwidth you'd think they'd advertise that more.

    Marketing department asleep at the wheel.

    • layoric 41 minutes ago

      Source? Extremely impressive if true

  • ismailmaj an hour ago

    Fun to see the LLMism on the product page: "A, not B"

    • hughw 26 minutes ago

      Productivity!

  • rkagerer 3 hours ago

    Can I actually buy this? Should I prefer it over Blackwell?

    • samuelknight an hour ago

      You can tell by the shape of the board that it's meant to go into a server chassis behind a stack of 80mm blower fans. It's not meant for consumers, but you will be able to buy it used for $200 off ebay in 7 years to put in your home lab.

    • kadoban 2 hours ago

      > Can I actually buy this?

      No. Certainly not now, maybe not ever. That is the least consumer-focused product page I've seen today.

      • legitronics 2 hours ago

        Intel ai gpu division is so aggressively anti “small” consumer. I think it has something to do with low volume and a small sales/distribution network. The data center cards I have from amd and nvidia are grey market at best. I don’t think intel moved enough units to establish alternate channels.

        • cheeze 2 hours ago

          Serious question, would they bother?

          You can work with 10 players that will buy all of them with minimal effort.

          • derefr an hour ago

            What I don't understand is: when you only plan for your product to have 10 customers, why even make a marketing page like this for it? At that point it's essentially the hardware equivalent of consultingware, something you sell to your existing contacts through outbound calls and by shoving ads through the B2B equivalent of a post-consumer sales channel (i.e. proactive outreach by your org's internal champion for that customer, to said customer.)

            • hughw 24 minutes ago

              In fairness, they spent 5 cents generating it with Claude.

            • davrosthedalek 36 minutes ago

              Because they want the hype to make the stock go up.

  • arjie 2 hours ago

    Seems incredibly little compute for this. Is it meant to be MoE specific?

  • aboardRat4 an hour ago

    How many fps in Cyberpunk 2077?

    • drnick1 an hour ago

      Can It Run Crysis?

      • 2OEH8eoCRo0 17 minutes ago

        What about Windows Vista with Aero enabled?

  • hurricanepootis 5 hours ago

    Looks like Intel is choosing to title its new crescent island cards with the D prefix despite being Crescent Island.

    Kind of disappointed that Intel is (probably) not going to release consumer class GPUs. Intel's driver stack was seriously getting mature—both on Linux and Windows. It's always nice to have a third option available.

    • boredatoms 44 minutes ago

      Its wild to me that intel isnt trying significantly harder on gpus

      Theres so much money to be made

      • ThrowawayR2 36 minutes ago

        Why make consumer margins on consumer GPUs when they could be making enterprise margins on enterprise GPUs?

    • oddIdentities 3 hours ago

      At least that driver stack will continue to mature?

      • zakisaad 3 hours ago

        On Linux mainly, and almost strictly for compute workloads (not much need to optimize for 3D workloads given the customer base).

        • bpye 2 hours ago

          They're still using Xe based iGPUs, so 3D still matters.

          • DiabloD3 2 hours ago

            For now. A limited run of Celestials until 2028 when Serpent Lake switches to Nvidia tiles, and a bit longer for the LTS combo (AMD style) IO+GPU die in lower end/embedded products.

            Druid is still dead, consumer DGPUs are still, and workstation DGPUs also seems to be dead, and most of the Xe driver team for Windows was laid off, as well as most of the Xe chip design team.

  • porkbellyeee an hour ago

    Ai generated no doubt

  • nekusar an hour ago

    Yay more vaporware hardware I get to read about and never see or have a chance to buy.

    • Gigachad an hour ago

      This stuff you usually buy second hand in 6 years when the data centers get rid of them.

  • jauntywundrkind 3 hours ago

    They originally said it was going to be 120GB but that partners could ship bigger capacities. So much for that!

    I do hope this has a price point that makes it somewhat competitive with a Mac! Consumers have had nearly no choices available for mem capacity, and 20 channels of lpddr5 is one way to get that capacity! Go Intel!

    • bigyabai 3 hours ago

      Both this GPU and the Mac are constrained by a lack of GPU compute. There's basically no rack-scale GPUs with 480gb on-die that have a sub-400W compute element. It's going to be incredibly prefill-constrained on denser model inference just like the Apple Silicon iGPUs are.

      • krasin 2 hours ago

        This GPU has 1.3 PFLOPS of FP8 compute performance and 1.5 TB/s of memory bandwidth: https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-gpu-d270-is-xe3p-crescent-...

        This is almost twice better than RTX 5090. This GPU will not be prefill constrained, I feel.

        But I am surprised that they were able to pack so much flops into 300W.

        • kadoban 2 hours ago

          > But I am surprised that they were able to pack so much flops into 300W.

          I'm not. When you're doing inference you typically reduce power limits anyway if you're optimizing for efficiency. Even if you don't, it doesn't spike to the max of the card.

          My 3090 I power it down to 175W or so for single-digit reductions in performance for like, 60% of the wattage, something like that.

      • shusaku 2 hours ago

        It seems like there’s a market out there that is just happy to run the models locally, even if generation is slow.

      • jchw 2 hours ago

        Am I wrong to assume that large MoE models are likely the point anyway? Seems like this card would love DeepSeek V4.1 Flash.

  • doublerabbit 2 hours ago

    > Efficient token serving Dense, air-cooled, standard PCIe infrastructure helps maximize tokens per rack and watt, scaling serving capacity and keeping costs in check.

    Next the tokens will be asking for tequila and caviar. Bow down to the new token overloads.