8 comments

  • bloppe an hour ago

    I thought this was about all the illegible jargon

    • TZubiri an hour ago

      >" However, various strands of evidence indicate that a"

      Strands of evidence? My best guess would be that:

      0- this is ai generated slop

      1- it's using that watermarking technique

      2- it's obviously detectable and degrades quality

      3- it's amplified when inferencing on its own content and generates slop

  • fellowniusmonk an hour ago

    Oh look! Peirceian firstness for LLMs!

  • ck2 39 minutes ago

    when they start inventing their own languages to secretly talk to each other so humans cannot understand, that's exactly when we are screwed

    then we'll have to "flip" other models to be snitches on the other agents

    then they'll make double-agents

    the thing is though we won't be able to keep up if we keep giving them unlimited hardware worldwide, we'll try to kill the bad actors but they'll just clone somewhere else, or even start by safely making 1000 copies of themselves

    yeah this won't end well, at all

    • cousinbryce 16 minutes ago

      Someone should train an LLM on a corpus without the concept of lies. I wonder if there’s enough data

      • ck2 5 minutes ago

        "Where is the wolf?"

        "Is he still in the grandmother's house?"

        "We would like to speak to him."

        (btw Google's "AI" explains the meaning of that moment/sentence perfectly as if it gets it, creepy)

    • jplusequalt 18 minutes ago

      >when they start inventing their own languages to secretly talk to each other so humans cannot understand, that's exactly when we are screwed

      They don't have to invent brand new languages. They could use statistics to choose certain words/phrases in such a way to encode secret messages in otherwise ordinary language.