Chess.com Leak Exposes 7.3M Users, Evidence Points to Scraping

(securityaffairs.com)

60 points | by kristianp 6 hours ago ago

20 comments

  • Shank 5 hours ago

    > Every record has gam_audiences and audiences_member_of populated, Google Ad Manager audience segments, with values like coach-nudge experiment groups, trial eligibility, lapsed-user cohorts and rating-band targeting.

    It sure seems like the evidence doesn't point to scraping to me.

  • sidrag22 5 hours ago

    > The data had been pulled by abusing the platform’s find-friends feature

    Sounds like the find-friends feature shouldn't allow access to the majority of that data unless the "friend" accepts, don't think the "scraper" got 7mil accepts just because they had access to emails... To me this is 100% a breach, even more so because its already happened once years ago to 700k, and they changed nothing to prevent it.

    • jeroenhd 2 hours ago

      A lot of chess.com information is public (by default) if you know someone's profile. Stuff a couple million email addresses and phone numbers into the "find friend" API and all you need to get profile information is the associated account username.

      Chess.com should probably prevent scraping, but as we can read in just about every comment thread about LLMs/Cloudflare/Anubis/Go-away, that's not as easy as it sounds these days.

    • samus 5 hours ago

      It might very well be possible that there were API endpoints that exposed way too much information. I also think that this wouldn't qualify as "scraping".

  • dwroberts an hour ago

    Worth noting this was reported back in August, it’s not new

  • Lucasoato 3 hours ago

    I just got a message from an Hacker: "You seriously just played London opening as white and King Indian defense as black for the last 3 months?"

    Btw I hate that chess.com puts game reviews under their most expensive plan, I ain't paying so much for something I can get in lichess for free.

    • gregorygoc 3 hours ago

      Exactly, chess.com is at value extraction phase. Lichess is much better platform now.

      • mitxela 2 hours ago

        Wasn't this literally always the case and the very reason lichess was created? And yet it remains #2.

        • demibabs 2 hours ago

          Some battles are won at the domain registry.

      • a_c 2 hours ago

        I only started playing less than a year ago. I paid for one year because of game review to improve my game. Didn't know lichess exist, but I'm not paying for a second year for sure

  • nilslindemann 4 hours ago

    I just logged in to delete my chess.com account, got a message: "This account is closed, please log in with your e-Mail to reactivate". No word by them having been hacked.

  • MiroslavPokorny 3 hours ago

    Hack or scraping, both are equally bad.

  • m00x 3 hours ago

    uh oh. If my ELO gets back to my friends I'm going to be very embarrassed.

  • TheSpacerr 5 hours ago

    Basically our data is free.

    • zx8080 3 hours ago

      Peasants have no rights and shall be slaves.

  • efilife 2 hours ago

    What's the forum shown in the screenshot?

  • ed_mercer 5 hours ago

    email? Is a user's email up for grabs just like that?

  • unixhero 5 hours ago

    Is scraping wrong that, is the question.