35 comments

  • legitster 33 minutes ago

    > WordPress founder and a key advocate for the open source community

    This should probably say self appointed advocate. He really hasn't advocated for much beyond collecting payments to Automattic.

  • ebilgenius 8 minutes ago

    > Mullenweg responded to our inquiry, saying a blog post is forthcoming. When it dropped, it was about him buying a houseboat.

  • autophagian 34 minutes ago

    Has very little to do with the current brou-ha-ha, but I just realised its “Automattic” because his name is “Matt”. It’s like a veil over the world has been lifted.

    • brandall10 4 minutes ago

      Someone made the same comment in the thread from a few days back. Yeah, it was the first time I realized it as well.

    • vjvjvjvjghv 26 minutes ago

      That’s fast! It usually takes me decades, if ever, to figure out this stuff. One of the downsides being slightly autistic and taking everything too literal

      • moritzwarhier 7 minutes ago

        [delayed]

      • dnautics 7 minutes ago

        Hasnt automattic been around for a decade?

        • dpark 4 minutes ago

          Two decades. It was founded in 2005

    • Hamuko 14 minutes ago

      At least his egotrips make a bit more sense after you realise it.

    • layer8 28 minutes ago

      It feels like I see this comment in every single Automattic thread on HN. :)

    • benatkin 23 minutes ago

      Y combinator helped people notice it when they invested in a company called Automatic https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/automatic However now that it's been acquired that reminder of Automattic not being named Automatic is gone.

  • throwawaymatt 7 minutes ago

    Just when we (the WP community) thought things were settling down and cooler heads might be prevailing... this happens. Uhg, not great for someone who has invested over 15 years into building with WP and does (paid) business with an Automattic company.

  • JonAtkinson 34 minutes ago

    This must be exhausting for the Automattic staff who just want to get on with their jobs.

    • legitster 32 minutes ago

      Anyone who wanted to get on with their jobs would have taken one of the buyouts. Everyone who still works there has to be committed to Matt.

      • BobAliceInATree 25 minutes ago

        Changing jobs can be rough or maybe even impossible in this job market. I'm sure there are many there that are not aligned with Matt, but just need the steady paycheck. Same was true after Elon took over twitter.

        • threetonesun 21 minutes ago

          Applying the word "impossible" to leaving a white collar job seems like a stretch. Also the buyout was almost 2 years ago now, anyone still there must be either in dire financial straits or quite commited.

          • paul7986 11 minutes ago

            That's until you find yourself in this job market and you realize now how stupid the digital creation job market and overall jobs are. Once you get laid you are now you're in a pile of 100 other applicants equally qualified vying for the same job and then hundreds of thousands who can all type to Ai to do a job that once required knowledge & skill.

            • zimpenfish 3 minutes ago

              > Once you get laid you are now you're in a pile of 100 other applicants equally qualified

              I'm assuming there should be an "off" after "laid"...

            • zdragnar 7 minutes ago

              Only 100? Those are good odds in the current market...

      • 0gs 2 minutes ago

        or they just love wordpress, the product, so much, and believe in it fully. lol

  • sillysaurusx 14 minutes ago

    What is it about Automattic's structure that lets Matt stay in control? Even Travis got ousted at Uber, and he was the primary founder. Is the company set up in a way that makes removing Matt very difficult?

    • manarth 3 minutes ago

      He controls roughly 84% of the share-stakeholder votes.

  • minimaxir an hour ago
  • eclipticplane 35 minutes ago

    I'm just glad to have my last projects off of Wordpress to get to no longer care about drama at Automattic that seems to never end.

  • ttul 16 minutes ago

    Most surprising in this article is the vibrant HDR magenta circle on Matt’s Twitter.

  • pluc 22 minutes ago

    i'm gonna wait to hear it from the people who were saying yesterday they were in control if that's ok

    > As of yet, no one at Automattic has heard a confirmation from the board. Mark Davies’ Slack account was also deactivated, sources said.

    mhm, ok.

    • chuckadams 12 minutes ago

      Davies was supposedly the one who originally cooked up the whole extortion scheme against major players in the WP space. WPE was just the first target of many that were planned. Not that Matt is absolved in any way, but it'll be interesting to see what falls out if and when he throws Davies under the bus.

  • VCFundedGenYer 24 minutes ago

    When the CEO becomes a diva, the company has lost the plot.

  • walrus01 28 minutes ago

    Doesn't he control 84% of the voting stock or something? I'm curious how a board could even oust him in the first place. Or so he claims.

    • jsnell 9 minutes ago

      The ability to appoint a board member doesn't mean you get to control their every decision. Nor is their fiduciary duty just one shareholder.

      Of course usually hand-picked boards don't go against their benefactor, and they're not keeping their seats.

      That they did in this case says something about just how bad the situation will be.

  • xnx 30 minutes ago

    Does Matt own >50%? If so, the board is irrelevant. If not, I assume he would've been gone long ago.

  • bedroom_jabroni 32 minutes ago

    Damn it hasn't even been a week.

  • benatkin 28 minutes ago

    It would have been just a matter of time before he displayed his power with the nonprofit and wordpress.com which he controls personally, independently of the Automattic board. Maybe that is part of why the board gave him his control of Automattic back so quickly.

  • lellow 22 minutes ago

    [dead]

  • figassis 32 minutes ago

    Is it perhaps time to ackowledge that boards where everyone is buddies can't actually do their jobs, yet they get paid obscene amounts of money?