CXMT Pioneers Mass-Production of LPDDR6

(cxmt.com)

37 points | by ENOMEM a day ago ago

17 comments

  • donmcronald a day ago

    As a regular consumer I've pretty much decided I'll buy China's tech if they start competing in the western market. There's a lot of talk about China dumping into western markets and warnings that we'll be left with nothing at some point, but I'm sitting here right now with... nothing.

    I'll buy RAM from the devil if it's the difference between running local AI vs becoming dependent on a cloud provider.

    • hakfoo 20 hours ago

      Western manufacturers really shot themselves in the crotch with this one. Foot isn't strong enough here.

      Had CXMT hit a normal functioning market, they would be a much harder sell-- existing vendors could spread FUD about performance and quality to hold them back for a few years. But now you have an audience that is desperate to the verge of soldering up banks of 74LS74 flip-flops to make their own RAM.

      It's not even like they're offering a reasonable "there's a domestic product but it's marginally more expensive" alternative. And it's all their fault. I sort of wonder if someone was actually saying "we'd better keep some supply around just to avoid burning our bridges with Dell/HP/Apple/etc." when the deals went down.

      The US might try to go protectionist/China-baiting to keep CXMT products off their market, but I expect they'll sell just fine everywhere else.

      • donmcronald 18 hours ago

        > Had CXMT hit a normal functioning market, they would be a much harder sell-- existing vendors could spread FUD about performance and quality to hold them back for a few years.

        I agree with this. Off-brand NVMe and SSDs are really in your face right now and as people buy them out of desperation they’re learning they work just fine. Western manufacturers have done massive damage to their long term brands for some short term profits.

    • SXX a day ago

      If not for China majority of green energy supply wouldnt exist. Neither would near-SotA LLMs with open weights.

      I might not like CCP, Xi or whatever they do inside their country, but China is net positive for the world.

      Refreshing considering how more and more of western countries are controlled by populists and / or delussional billionare overlords who reject global warming, vaccines, nuclear energy, etc.

      • AuthAuth 19 hours ago

        if not for China emissions wouldnt have gone past the point of no return.

        • orangeboats 19 hours ago

          The majority of those emissions comes from manufacturing products for the Western world.

          • AuthAuth 2 hours ago

            So what? The goods get made in China because china allows them to be made with no emission/environmental/health and safety regulation.

        • showmexyz 15 hours ago

          Comulative CO2 emissions tell a different story.

          https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-co-emissions

          • AuthAuth 2 hours ago

            emissions pre 1950 and post 2000 are weighted completely different. Emissions post 2014 climate agreement are weighed even heavier.

        • Arnt 16 hours ago

          Would not have done so yet you mean.

          The other biggest emitter is still barely decreasing its emissions, far less halting. A slight decrease in the rate per year does not save us from the point of no return.

          • AuthAuth 2 hours ago

            You can look at the emissions growth of all the major emitters around 15 years ago and they're all slowing their growth and tapering off.. except china which is doing a hockey stick curve rushing to get as many coal plants down as they can.

        • deadfoxygrandpa 15 hours ago

          yeah the solution was to ask the poorest countries in the world to give up and remain poor

          • AuthAuth 2 hours ago

            At the time when china should have begun reducing emissions 2014 they were one of the biggest economies in the world.

  • maxglute 19 hours ago

    Hopefully PRC will involute the shit out of compute and commoditize it like agriculture, margins should be so thin that ASML/TSMC/NVIDIA should only be sustained by subsidies.

  • ddxv 20 hours ago

    I really hope we get to crest this hardware supply shortages and drop into oversupply.

    • sleepytimetea 19 hours ago

      Across the global volume of 185 million to 220 million laptops per year, where manufacturers were putting in 16GB RAM for the past decade (or longer), we really need 128GB to run local inference for the AI-centric world of the future, so that is an additional 112 GB per laptop - this creates an annual shortfall of 20.72 to 24.64 billion gigabytes (20.72 to 24.64 Exabytes) of DRAM. Just for laptops alone, ignoring the desktop or server or cloud or other markets.

      Manufacturing supply is going to take 5 years to catch up. Buy memory stocks (MU/SKHynix) - they will be multiple of their current prices in 5 years.

  • imtringued 16 hours ago

    Most DDR5 is sold at 6000Mbps, LPDDR6 more than doubles this to 12800Mbps and the high end RAM could theoretically operate at 16000Mbps. This means every single PC or Laptop could have a good fraction of Strix Halo level memory bandwidth out of the box beating a Geforce 1060 for budget PCs and the next generation of Strix Halo would have 90% of the memory bandwidth of a Geforce 5060.