45 comments

  • geori 23 minutes ago

    Lol at "On secondary markets, investors have propelled the company to a $1.5 billion valuation."

    • jasonjmcghee 20 minutes ago

      typo? or did an editor see the original and say "trillion must be a typo"

      • irthomasthomas 6 minutes ago

        I imagine the logprob of b is much greater than t in this context for most models. So 'trillion' gets corrected to the more likely 'billion'.

      • zarzavat 4 minutes ago

        Freudian slip.

    • lukan 9 minutes ago

      Fixed it seems.

  • zeafoamrun 7 minutes ago

    They should just give engineers PDWs and call it a day.

  • doughnutstracks 42 minutes ago

    At first I read the title as a possible missile strike on Anthropic's office by a hostile actor.

    • wrash-qwtr a minute ago

      If it happened, they better don't run polls for popular support. If the building were empty at the time of the strike, you'd probably get 70% among college students (Luigi had 41%).

    • coredog64 4 minutes ago

      One can always hope

  • mandarinclips 17 minutes ago

    Everyone should boycott Anthropic and stop using Claude. I'm starting with myself.

  • ReptileMan 25 minutes ago

    It is not as if they can't write encouraging prompts to mythos from everywhere.

    • dgellow a minute ago

      Imagine a world where 20% of the world compute is allocated to cheerleader-agents encouraging the other agents, and that’s the actual secret recipe to build an AGI

  • bediger4000 21 minutes ago

    Wow, this is bad news. Without in-office collaboration, company culture will collapse. The organic moments of spontaneous synergy won't take place. Perhaps OpenAI or even xAI will take over as leading company. Grim.

    • fluxusars 19 minutes ago

      "Claude, was this sarcasm?"

      - You're absolutely right!

  • wonderwonder an hour ago

    And there goes every single rational for having a security team at the disaster bunkers the billionaires are building

    • derwiki 44 minutes ago

      They’ll be armed Boston Dynamics robots soon

    • philipallstar 44 minutes ago

      Presumably they'll have stuff there the security team wants.

      • deadbunny 22 minutes ago

        The security team have guns and aren't given a 2nd thought, kinda invisible even. They don't need to negotiate.

      • zbentley 41 minutes ago

        Like security guards' families.

        Awful, but not without historical precedent.

        • somenameforme 19 minutes ago

          Which precedent?

          Grunts under coercion has a rich history that's still ongoing, but these sort of guards are those that would have both weapons and the guarded in their direct vicinity. I can't think of any historic example where this wasn't the loyalest of the loyal types.

        • Tade0 25 minutes ago

          Fear the security guard who has nothing to lose.

        • philipallstar 35 minutes ago

          I did almost write that! But if disaster really strikes, then just resources will be useful.

        • stymaar 5 minutes ago

          And who guards the guards family?

          These billionaires who have always relied on the power of the state for their security and asserting their property are absolutely delusional if they think they can keep it without it.

          When states collapse, the one who emerge victorious aren't the well-mannered business people, it's the warlords (a.k.a. the heads of organized crime).

    • sailfast 17 minutes ago

      Don’t think those folks are union…

    • tracerbulletx 43 minutes ago

      There have been plenty of times in history (almost all times) that physically weaker men have secured the loyalty of soldiers with wealth and influence during periods where strong centralized civic authorities did not exist.

      • js8 a few seconds ago

        But the soldiers didn't have the mobile phones then. This was possible by manipulation the information about reality those soldiers had.

        For example, how Mallory can gain power over Alice and Bob who don't directly communicate.

        First, Mallory tells Alice: "I am stronger than you. If you don't do what I say I'll kill you." So Alice decides to submit.

        Then, Mallory takes Alice to Bob and says to him: "Together with Alice we are stronger than you, and kill you if you don't do what I want." So Bob submits.

        This only works if Bob doesn't talk to Alice, otherwise they would together see the empty threat.

        With more people, it becomes a bit trickier but hopefully you see how blocking communication helps to gain power over people. Often the blocking of communication is done through propaganda, e.g. Mallory might entice Alice and Bob to hate each other, so they wouldn't get together and figure he's the manipulator. Or Mallory might just kill someone randomly to motivate people not to talk to each other.

        Anyway, this shows the importance of free speech (which is really a misnomer; it should be called a right to listen). If you can freely talk (and listen) to other people, you reduce your chances to being subjugated by someone.

    • bpodgursky an hour ago

      If civilization collapses, the billionaires are correctly assuming the security team will stop following SEIU strike authorization protocol.

      • ceejayoz 43 minutes ago

        They are perhaps incorrectly assuming the security team with all the weaponry will remain loyal to them.

        • john_strinlai 34 minutes ago

          that's probably dependent on the specific genre of collapse we get to enjoy

        • bpodgursky 35 minutes ago

          Sure. Who knows.

          But, historically, strongmen/chieftains have not had incredible trouble keeping their goons under control. Most threats from from palace coups not popular revolt. Most normal people in uncertain times like order and aren't going to flip the table on a system that gives them stability, food and shelter.

          • nemomarx 20 minutes ago

            Would "one of you promises the security team better conditions if they kill a rival" not be how palace coups usually work?

          • stymaar 3 minutes ago

            > historically, strongmen/chieftains have

            Yup, but those aren't the same people as the one who get to become tech billionaires.

          • ceejayoz 32 minutes ago

            > But, historically, strongmen/chieftains have not had incredible trouble keeping their goons under control.

            Sure. But some of them seize power from others on their way up via force.

      • dayvid 28 minutes ago

        Just pay them well enough. Or pay the people at the top a good amount of money to keep the people below in check and have some hope you can rise to the top for a small portion of the people.

        • inigyou 24 minutes ago

          If civilization collapses, money is useless

  • bbor 31 minutes ago

    The idea of Anthropic allowing a contractor to squeeze such a tiny cost center at such a massive PR cost right before their IPO is just an objective blunder, IMHO. They should've replied to that email with a quick "No, you will be negotiating with the union tomorrow morning. You maybe eventually saving millions right now could cost us literally billions."

    • kennywinker 25 minutes ago

      Strikes only happen when management has refused to negotiate in good faith already. Usually many times refused.

      • forestrywat 22 minutes ago

        I think the parent poster is saying, "management, get your fucking head on straight and negotiate properly".

    • alephnerd 27 minutes ago

      Ik the building intimately - it's not Anthroptic but the building's security company (which A the pic does not own and is subleasing). SEIU is working to organize Allied Universal in California.

      Support SEIU organizing them (their fighting the good fight in this case), but this specific article is clickbait.

      • forestrywat 24 minutes ago

        So you go to the building owner and say, "give them what they want or we walk." Security team probably doesn't want outrageous changes. Building owner probably just being greedy.

        • t098i3 22 minutes ago

          As I understand it, this union negotiation isn't with a single building, it's with multiple large staffing firms across California

        • alephnerd 23 minutes ago

          You can't in most cases. These buildings are owned by larger conglomerates and are out of scope of landlord-leasee negotiations especially as it's a sublease.

          Allied United is one of the larger security augmentation firms in the nation, which makes is harder. For example, my Alma mater was secured by Allied Universal as well as a dedicated PD because the dedicated PD didn't want to be bag check for a library when they have been dealing with real crime (eg. A comrade in their sister PD across town's was shot by the Boston marathon bombers).