The author's AI applied a thin layer of varnish to what is more or less handwaving. I think more people need to take an undergraduate level statistics course; the conclusions made are completely unsupported by the random trials.
Weighing six rocks a hundred times doesn't tell you the average weight of a mountain.
Great criticism. I should have examined the numbers and the experimental setup more closely before publishing.
The signal is there - repetition does help but the exact quantitative conclusions are erroneous in this post.
That aside, I like the way it's put - "Weighing six rocks a hundred times doesn't tell you the average weight of a mountain".
This is hilarious, as someone who has harassed friends for repeating themselves multiple times on nearly every prompt and they swear by that approach. Too funny, too funny, too funny.
I'm really put of reading ai-isms like "It quits working around the fourth time, and the average hides who it worked for"
This is classic Claude, and makes me think the author didn't read, edit, or invest in their own words.
The author's AI applied a thin layer of varnish to what is more or less handwaving. I think more people need to take an undergraduate level statistics course; the conclusions made are completely unsupported by the random trials.
Weighing six rocks a hundred times doesn't tell you the average weight of a mountain.
Great criticism. I should have examined the numbers and the experimental setup more closely before publishing. The signal is there - repetition does help but the exact quantitative conclusions are erroneous in this post.
That aside, I like the way it's put - "Weighing six rocks a hundred times doesn't tell you the average weight of a mountain".
> and the average hides who it worked for.
**** off. Can't even get through the ****ing subtitle any longer these days.
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice… Beetlejuice
I added this to copilot-instructions.md but it had no effect on the answers.
This is hilarious, as someone who has harassed friends for repeating themselves multiple times on nearly every prompt and they swear by that approach. Too funny, too funny, too funny.
It's obviously ai prose but knowing it is good to know I guess
Say it once but request a prompt to be sure.
This is so stupid, I love it. Captures everything about the modern Tech Priest praying to the machine spirit.
More slop.
Now fill the context in batches of 10% and see where its obedience drops off
Great suggestion. This can be a new post. Stay tuned. Much appreciate your time.