9 comments

  • ecshafer 36 minutes ago

    Anecdata I was living very close to a busy highway, and my young daughter was wheazing when she had a cold, we had to give her medicine via a nebulizer. When we moved out to the country more, far away from any major roads, these issues all disappeared within a couple months.

  • stuaxo an hour ago

    I've needed my inhaler way less since the ULEZ came in.

    Visiting London used to mean blowing your nose to black snot for a week afterwards, these days living in London it's pretty good.

  • satvikpendem 32 minutes ago

    Using scientists being "stunned" should take the same amount of relevance as someone being "slammed" in article titles.

    • powerpcmac 28 minutes ago

      I'd like to imagine the stunned scientist is a scientist from another field, they show some medical findings to a guy who looks at snail butts all day and he's the one "stunned" by the findings

  • XorNot 31 minutes ago

    So punchline, probably a good idea to electrify all the cars yeah?

    • jimbob45 23 minutes ago

      That doesn’t solve brake and tire particles. Although…rail might solve those?

      • cousinbryce 20 minutes ago

        https://www.emissionsanalytics.com/news/pollution-tyre-wear-... Rail, bike, even busses are better. Cars are uniquely bad transportation in urban environments

        • mhandley 7 minutes ago

          Do the numbers in that article make sense? 5.8g/km for tyre wear? Generally my tyres last maybe 25000 miles. So at that rate they would lose 230kg. Seems high.

      • mhandley 18 minutes ago

        Tyre, no, but regen braking almost eliminates brake particles at the speeds I drive in London. But mostly I take the train. Unfortunately the highest I measured on my particulate sensor is not near the roads, but in the tube.