Things That Used to Be Normal and Are Now a Luxury

(albertogalca.com)

23 points | by albertogalca 2 hours ago ago

30 comments

  • hx8 an hour ago

    I don't think these things are luxury at all, but can be packaged as luxury. For example, you can find quiet parks in most metro areas or you can go to a retreat in a resort in the mountains.

    For years I've been buying only 98%+ natural fiber clothing. I can still find t-shirts for about $10, but I do have to spend time examining the tag on clothes. I also noticed that Nordstrom's app can filter by fabric type, but the clothes there are sold at a premium.

  • noosphr an hour ago

    Darkness. Before 1900 every human being that ever lived had perfect darkness every night they looked out their window. Today you have to go between hundreds to thousands of kilometres away from cities before you see it.

    • leephillips 28 minutes ago

      This is a real loss, unlike the manufactured despair in the article.

  • LogicFailsMe an hour ago

    Silence died before social media. Silence died with pervasive flat screen TVs everywhere sometime during the mid-90s. I was in grad school at the time, and one by one, the previously quiet spots in cafeterias between meals and nooks went loud with a TV permanently tuned to ESPN or 24/7 news. It was like the planet Kakrafoon Kappa as if the most dangerous thing in the world was to allow students to be alone with their thoughts. Then it hit the restaurants and cafes.

    And while one could get away from this by taking a walk, cell phones finished the job. It's unreal to see someone walking their unruly dog, borderline shambling, while they stare, transfixed, into their phone. And I am out of you-know-whats w/r to this. Zuck won because he gave people what they craved. It wasn't what they needed, and it's up to the people to break their own addictions. I figure that's either after the commencement of my dirt nap or some contrived utterly avoidable apocalypse scenario triggered by our collective negligence on par with an expectedly dirty telephone as the root of a global pandemic.

    • AnimalMuppet 5 minutes ago

      I used to go out into the Mojave Desert for a few days. It's quiet out there - so quiet that your own footsteps are very loud. You're also very much on your own out there. That dirt road you're stopped on might see two cars in the next 24 hours, or zero. It was amazingly freeing. You could hear yourself think, and nobody could bother or interrupt you.

      Then my wife started worrying about my safety out there, and insisted that I carry a cell phone. Well, she was undoubtedly right that it was safer (this is another reason that married men live longer). But a bit of the freedom disappeared too - now I could be interrupted at any time, and sometimes I was.

    • gWPVhyxPHqvk an hour ago

      TikTok has ruined public transportation for me. One idiot blasting short videos on their phone at 7am is so annoying. I remember back in the 90s there were signs for no boomboxes on trains. Now it's nearly expected that someone is mindlessly scrolling TikTok at max volume per car.

      • mdp2021 37 minutes ago

        What you are describing is actually the coma of civic society: in proper societies (I have witnessed them), the «idiot» ("layman in civic education") would have been corrected by the affected and informed by his acquaintances.

        It is a grave sign of downfall when disturbing elements roam unreached by any wakers.

        Note that the phenomenon is symmetrical in the "upper" strata: just like in the lower "kids (of any age) are an island", in the upper administrations embrace the absurd without the voices of the intellectuals chastizing them.

      • LogicFailsMe 44 minutes ago
  • ux266478 an hour ago

    Scientifically speaking, time is a measurement of how much worse things have gotten. The irony is that this is also one of the oldest truisms that humanity has grappled with over the millennia. See: Hesiod's Ages of Man, Biblical Genesis, The Epic of Gilgamesh and many other Mesopotamian epics, the Vedic Yugas, etc.

  • wasabi991011 35 minutes ago

    This is just complete hyperbole with no substance.

    For 1, I still have yet to go to a restaurant where I couldn't ask the waiter for a physical menu instead of reading the QR code (not to mention that QR code menus are still far from the majority in every city I've been to, small and large). Are there any other examples where you "need" to be online when going out?

    For 3, I've never been to a supermarket that doesn't have fresh local produce. The existence of a ready-made meal or of a more complicated snack food doesn't make produce in the same store any less real.

    • LogicFailsMe 19 minutes ago

      The implicit contract is that you are online if you have to ask for the damned menu. It is not an improvement in the dining experience to scan a QR code to order, or to read a menu, an important part of the dining out experience, on a cell phone screen. Yes I can ask for a printed menu. Nope, I don't want to. I'm eating out to get away from staring at a screen. Is that really that hard to grasp?

      And then they want a tip from their QR code ordering system. I love AI, and I work with AI, but JFC tipping an honest to god waiter (and ya know, if it's a charming robot that puts on some theatre as a waiter - not a gloried tray on wheels, that's cool too, but my cellphone isn't that) is an important signal to the quality of the service and you've rubbed me wrong from the get go forcing me implicitly to bring my phone in the first place.

      AI's prominent spokesmodels considered harmful IMO

    • mdp2021 25 minutes ago

      > restaurant where I couldn't ask the waiter for a physical menu

      Happened to me. In one, "Ok, if you don't have own ways to read our electronic menu, I'll hand you the owner's tablet". (Bankrupted after a few months after years of prestigious service to its customers - the quality was good, the management "simple".) In another, "Ah, oh, so you do not have a way to... Really?! Well... Ok... Look: what would you like to eat?" - the manager did not know his own menu (but was open to discuss possibilities).

      The point is not with the exceptions: it is with the creeping ignorance that gives assumptions for granted. And you should be ___very___ worried when the ignorant is not a service provider, but maybe your administration that takes for granted electronic money or a google|apple|microsoft account.

  • hankbond an hour ago

    Cotton, linen, wool gang represent.

    • ghaff an hour ago

      Clothes (patched up as needed), beyond the minimum, long used to be a luxury for the most part.

  • 2d8a875f-39a2-4 an hour ago

    Well sure, and lots of things that used to be luxury items are now normal. The wheel turns.

  • ktallett an hour ago

    The clothing quality issue is in manufacturing and reducing the amount of fabric and thread used to make items. Seams are the bare minimum now etc. Likewise trainers soles have stopped using rubber and moved to far less durable synthetic materials.

    • LogicFailsMe 16 minutes ago

      Which is as capitalism demanded unfortunately. We live like Temu Kings of old but there will be a bar tab for the party eventually. Good luck predicting when though.

  • jway66 an hour ago

    Real estate

    • ghaff an hour ago

      There's still plenty of real estate. It probably just isn't where you want to live.

      • cucumber3732842 an hour ago

        Even if you did want to live there you probably can't develop anything on it because someone in an ivory tower decided that a certain number of ferns per square meter makes it a wetland or that it's probable habitat for some endangered desert bug, never-mind the fact that on the same land across the street BigCo somehow managed to put in a solar farm.....

  • bamboozled an hour ago

    Parmesan cheese

    • mdp2021 20 minutes ago

      I am pretty sure it's still there.

  • vorpalhex an hour ago

    Merino as a fabric is just a more delicate fabric.

  • YetAnotherNick an hour ago

    New cloth used to be luxury when I was a kid. Now everyone has 100s of pieces. I remember sewing and wearing cloth, and no one does it now. Also he kinda answered his question:

    > it(natural fiber cloth) lasted less than shirts I’ve paid 5€ for

    For being offline and in silence, it is as achievable as ever, if not more. Companies/friends etc. now are more respectful of time and being offline or not picking up call now than they were 20 years ago.

  • OttoVonBizark an hour ago

    Can we stop already with the flood of faux earnest ai slop blog posts - utter brain rot junk

  • ninajones an hour ago

    [dead]

  • readthenotes1 an hour ago

    I don't know where the author lives, but usually it's easy to find a store selling something.

    They've almost always been staffed by bored teenagers tho.

  • r3trohack3r an hour ago

    Also, things that used to be a luxury are now normal.

    • MarkusWandel an hour ago

      Yep. Precisely because of our efficient manufacturing, throw-away culture a lot of gadgets that used to be serious luxuries are now nearly free. For example basic espresso machines. In my area you can get one for $25 off FBM any day. Or (adjusted for inflation) affordable sandwiches with tasty ingredients nobody had heard of when I was a kid (I'm old). Or pretty decent bicycles if you're willing to learn a little how to fix them. Or low-end smartphones for about the price of a landline phone back in the day (adjusted for inflation) and cellular service plans that are actually much cheaper than a landline used to cost.

      Or synthetic clothing. Sure, natural fiber stuff is in retreat but some synthetic stuff is actually really comfortable.