How we used to get jobs: A newspaper classifieds story

(ironicsans.ghost.io)

45 points | by speckx 2 hours ago ago

19 comments

  • bluedino 2 minutes ago

    You'd mail your resume in (it was a 'hack' back then to hand-deliver it), then get a call in a couple days or weeks. Then someone who was home during the day (if you already had a job) would answer the phone and take the message from the HR person (or they'd leave one on your answering machine), you'd then have an appointment to go in or return a call to set one up...

  • subpixel an hour ago

    Not only jobs, but NYC apartments - although in the Voice not the Times.

    • georgemcbay an hour ago

      As someone who lived in NYC for a while circa 1999 the process at the time as I recall it was using a newspaper classified ad to find a broker to find an apartment.

      The vast majority of actual apartment listings were all gatekept within the broker system making hiring a broker (with an insane fee) effectively mandatory for actually finding a place to live in a reasonable timeframe.

      • geoduck14 27 minutes ago

        What about the obituary?

      • busterarm 23 minutes ago

        Brokers still gatekeep the best inventory in NYC for the most part.

        Every craigslist apartment I ever found was sketchy as hell.

        • pavel_lishin 13 minutes ago

          Every Craigslist apartment listing I've ever seen turned out to be through a broker as well.

  • II2II 17 minutes ago

    Another tidbit, based upon finding out which company the phone number belonged to: you could go to the library and access business directories. Think the yellow pages, only they were geared towards businesses rather than towards consumers. Print versions were broken down by industry, but electronic ones (on CD-ROM) were searchable. It was also a tool for looking for unadvertised jobs, since those directories seemed to be geared towards making cold calls (albeit, for people doing sales).

  • rzzzt an hour ago

    Looking straight into the eyes, strong handshake, exuding confidence?

    • ricardonunez an hour ago

      This but after going inside the building without authorization and saying you will not leave without a job.

      • II2II 12 minutes ago

        I encountered one corporation where you walked up to security, told them you were there to look for work, and they directed you to an office that contained posting of currently available positions. As far as I know, they didn't advertise job openings anywhere else. If you weren't willing to drop by their offices, they weren't interested in considering you.

        Of course, talking to anyone about a job within the building was an entirely different matter.

  • tayo42 32 minutes ago

    Idk if it's true but it seems like life was simpler before the Internet took off.

    Now that guy is probably competing with tons of people more talented willing to work for less

    • Aurornis 9 minutes ago

      > Now that guy is probably competing with tons of people more talented willing to work for less

      This strikes at the core of it. Life was simpler for those in the know about how the world worked. If you were lucky enough to grow up with the right parents, friends, family members, and class mates to help guide you through how the world worked it was easy. You could count on less competition by knowing where to look, how to present yourself, and what to say. Someone very talented but stuck in a situation where they didn't know how to find these jobs and apply properly was hard. You would lose career advancement at every step of the way relative to peers who had a social network that fed them this information.

      If you're one of the people with more talent and hungry for work, life actually got simpler for you in modern times. The advantages of being well-connected and groomed by your parents for success are still there, but they're diminished when everyone can find advice on the internet.

      I grew up on the cusp of this change. It's hard to communicate just how hard it was to navigate even simple things like interview prep or even dressing correctly for interviews if you weren't surrounded by people who had up to date info.

    • spicyusername 13 minutes ago

      Simplicity and convenience are often inversely correlated.

      Life was for sure simpler in times gone by, but that doesn't necessarily mean it was better. Definitely different.

      I'm sure future posters will look back on these years with fondness for this or that as well.

    • whaleofatw2022 20 minutes ago

      Used to flip both ways...

      I.e. for a time, it became easier for talented people to find a better role.

      In the last 5-10 years though, between the race to the bottom and AI/Bot spam (even ignoring the overall decrease in job availability) things frankly suck.

  • aksss 42 minutes ago

    Very self-satisfied, and deservedly so. Like when you use that one piece of scrap wood in the garage you've been saving for this one occasion, or something from that drawer of metric-threaded bolts that just saves the project you're working on. It was all worth it, see? This is why we do it. No different with the author's digital preservation and online tool use. Pleasant read.

  • pudgywalsh 41 minutes ago

    How tech company HR departments game the system for PERM jobs: A newspaper classifieds story

  • mikestew an hour ago

    In case the headline makes no sense, the original title before being mangled by the HN headline censor:

    "How We Used to Get Jobs".

    • tomhow an hour ago

      Fixed, thanks!

    • kgwgk an hour ago

      Thanks. What a pity, the mutilated title sounded promising.