"Stop being such a labdradoodle."
I wonder what model the author has been using to end up writing that context for Claude. Fable was pretty harsh in a couple of debugging sessions I had.
Opus 5 seemed to perform better at coding than in my short experience with prior versions. That said I cannot really compare them, as I only used them a couple of times. Last weeks I have been using mostly gpt-5.6 sol and fable. They have been helping me with my masters thesis debugging/refactoring code.
I managed to have a few sessions with fable without the safeguards triggering (bc cybersecurity project). So, my overall experience was better with gpt-5.6, also because fable noticed that the changes proposed by gpt were actually better than the ones from fable itself. I paid claude max subscription this month.
"Stop being such a labdradoodle." I wonder what model the author has been using to end up writing that context for Claude. Fable was pretty harsh in a couple of debugging sessions I had.
Fable burned my limits and therefore unused it only once. What is your experience with it vs Opus 5, and Opus 4.6?
Opus 5 seemed to perform better at coding than in my short experience with prior versions. That said I cannot really compare them, as I only used them a couple of times. Last weeks I have been using mostly gpt-5.6 sol and fable. They have been helping me with my masters thesis debugging/refactoring code. I managed to have a few sessions with fable without the safeguards triggering (bc cybersecurity project). So, my overall experience was better with gpt-5.6, also because fable noticed that the changes proposed by gpt were actually better than the ones from fable itself. I paid claude max subscription this month.