6 comments

  • Leftium 3 hours ago

    Theo video based on data from Tencent's Autocodebench: https://youtu.be/iV1EcfZSdCM

    Conclusion: Elixir was the best (had the highest problem solve rate).

    Reasons (Theo's interpretation):

    - code collocation, where documentation is integrated directly within the source code

    - design philosophy of a language (readability, clear idioms, and strict expectation management)

    ---

    Sources from video:

    - https://github.com/Tencent-Hunyuan/AutoCodeBenchmark/tree/ma...

    - https://martinalderson.com/posts/which-programming-languages...

    - https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jan/19/nanolang/#atom-everyth...

  • steveklabnik 4 hours ago

    The frontier moves quickly enough that empiric testing is often out of date by the time that it’s published.

    • mwigdahl 4 hours ago

      For sure! It's possible there are relatively invariant properties that make one language or another "better" for LLM coding in general though (even if that's just the self-fulfilling prophecy of size of the training corpus).

      • steveklabnik 4 hours ago

        I’m in agreement that I think that these exist, but I just haven’t seen anything that justifies this belief of mine yet. I have been looking, but it’s possible I just haven’t seen anything seen it.

        I’ve seen a lot of blog posts with fairly dubious claims here with relatively flimsy evidence. And I’ve seen a few papers trying to tackle the topic. But I think it’s a very open area of research currently.

  • markus_zhang 2 hours ago

    Which language is worst for AI? Just curious.

  • andsoitis 3 hours ago

    DSLs work especially well with LLMs. DSLs focus on a narrow set of concepts in a single domain.