6 comments

  • stereo an hour ago

    You've obviously written this because screen wasn't doing the right thing, but your readme only explains that it's a "young project, not a drop-in GNU screen replacement". What are its advantages over screen or tmux?

    • kylecarbs an hour ago

      Fair. Adding a section for this now.

      screen actually works the same way architecturally: it parses all output through its own built-in terminal emulator and redraws from that state on reattach. But that emulator is decades old and lags far behind what modern programs emit. Whatever it doesn't understand gets dropped or mangled on redraw. boo swaps that layer for libghostty-vt, Ghostty's VT core, so the saved state matches what your terminal would actually display, and terminal queries get answered while detached so TUIs don't hang unattended.

      tmux is great, it was just never the model I wanted. I really liked screen's simplicity, sessions and a prefix key and nothing else to learn, and boo keeps exactly that.

      • dgnemo an hour ago

        can you share more on the tmux model vs boo?

  • darkteflon 43 minutes ago

    Installed using the curl-to-bash on Sequoia and I’m getting “error: ReadOnlyFileSystem” on ‘boo new’. Can’t see any open issues on gh and nothing in the readme.

    Definitely interested in something like this - love ghostty and I’ve been finding Zellij a bit crashy recently (plus I don’t really need tabs).

    • kylecarbs 38 minutes ago

      I'll take a look at this now. Thanks for reporting!

  • asar an hour ago

    this looks nice! i've been using herdr the last couple of weeks as a terminal multiplexer for agents, which works amazingly well.