Great visual, but one thing I've noticed is that LLMs have taken most of the "magic" out of creating these sorts of visualizations. Usually, it required a large amount of dedication to the subject matter, teaching techniques, and graphic design. Now, anyone with a passing knowledge can make them. Not saying that's a negative by any means, but that large dedication usually meant that you could trust the author's work and that it wouldn't have any hallucinations. Now, I find myself reading these more on the defense that it could be wrong about something, and I can't even trust them at all if I don't know anything about the subject already.
I don't know, I feel like in "the olden days" before everyone just had a dreaming computer hallucinate it (I love the William Gibson-ness of this but I won't actually use it) we just threw everything into matplotlib ;-)
Every second paragraph, it seems very impressed to re-discover that CQT matches human aural perception.
Unfortunately, I have a faint recollection that CQT was expressly designed to match human aural perception, which leaves me markedly less perpetually astonished.
Great visual, but one thing I've noticed is that LLMs have taken most of the "magic" out of creating these sorts of visualizations. Usually, it required a large amount of dedication to the subject matter, teaching techniques, and graphic design. Now, anyone with a passing knowledge can make them. Not saying that's a negative by any means, but that large dedication usually meant that you could trust the author's work and that it wouldn't have any hallucinations. Now, I find myself reading these more on the defense that it could be wrong about something, and I can't even trust them at all if I don't know anything about the subject already.
I don't know, I feel like in "the olden days" before everyone just had a dreaming computer hallucinate it (I love the William Gibson-ness of this but I won't actually use it) we just threw everything into matplotlib ;-)
I know I did...
Every second paragraph, it seems very impressed to re-discover that CQT matches human aural perception.
Unfortunately, I have a faint recollection that CQT was expressly designed to match human aural perception, which leaves me markedly less perpetually astonished.