25 points | by adamthegoalie 6 hours ago ago
6 comments
The best code review improvement I have done in my workflow with Claude is using tuicr (https://tuicr.dev).
It runs locally, YOU review all the code locally, and feedback that to Claude.
Agents reviewing AI code always felt dirty to me, especially when working on production (non-disposable) code.
> Runs against your regular Claude Code subscription (Max plan recommended) — unlike /ultrareview, which charges against your Extra Usage pool.
How expensive is it to run in your experience? In $ or tokens?
We seem to be fighting complexity with complexity. Does it really help?
Holy vibe coding batman this looks like a repository with just a bazillion prompts of which there are already a million.
Seems like it would create a lot of friction and burn a lot of tokens.
"I pay Claude, to use Claude, to write instructions for Claude, to review code from Claude"
Have we all just given up?
That's looks like a fair bit of ceremony for what it does. Is this representative of the output? https://github.com/adamjgmiller/adamsreview/pull/3
The best code review improvement I have done in my workflow with Claude is using tuicr (https://tuicr.dev).
It runs locally, YOU review all the code locally, and feedback that to Claude.
Agents reviewing AI code always felt dirty to me, especially when working on production (non-disposable) code.
> Runs against your regular Claude Code subscription (Max plan recommended) — unlike /ultrareview, which charges against your Extra Usage pool.
How expensive is it to run in your experience? In $ or tokens?
We seem to be fighting complexity with complexity. Does it really help?
Holy vibe coding batman this looks like a repository with just a bazillion prompts of which there are already a million.
Seems like it would create a lot of friction and burn a lot of tokens.
"I pay Claude, to use Claude, to write instructions for Claude, to review code from Claude"
Have we all just given up?
That's looks like a fair bit of ceremony for what it does. Is this representative of the output? https://github.com/adamjgmiller/adamsreview/pull/3