If you have a lot of "images" with such effects to generate from dynamic text, using SVG makes no sense, is vastly more complex and less flexible than the solution here.
I wonder why the firefox CSS rendering engine prefers to smooth out. Looks like a dramatically different implementation, but maybe that's just because it's an edge case of rendering
Shadows have to be spread in a circle to achieve an outline, so the general shape will converge to roughly a circle, barely following the shape of the text.
People should quit trying to make CSS a drawing tool--it is not--and start learning how to use SVG instead or images.
If you have a lot of "images" with such effects to generate from dynamic text, using SVG makes no sense, is vastly more complex and less flexible than the solution here.
This could actually be cool for display text like a headline. I don’t think that’s only for images.
I wonder why the firefox CSS rendering engine prefers to smooth out. Looks like a dramatically different implementation, but maybe that's just because it's an edge case of rendering
firefox looks like an SDF (shortest distance to the object), I'm not sure what the chrome one is...
Neat! It's unfortunate that the rendering is so different between browsers.
Have you tried the same thing with shadows? They can also be stacked, I believe.
Shadows have to be spread in a circle to achieve an outline, so the general shape will converge to roughly a circle, barely following the shape of the text.