7 comments

  • 7777777phil a day ago

    Captive aftermarkets are roughly the biggest hidden cross-subsidy in consumer goods imo.. printer and tractor OEMs price the unit near cost and pull the lifetime margin out of parts, service, and locked firmware. That's why right-to-repair is one of the few issues where farm states and urban progressives end up in the same column.

  • erelong a day ago

    as an alternative to right-to-repair laws, consumers could simply buy repairable products and avoid unrepairable ones

    my only concerns with these laws is they help corps who can afford to make repairable designs and the laws will just be used against competitors who might struggle in the same way to comply with more red tape

    • happymellon 20 hours ago

      > as an alternative to right-to-repair laws, consumers could simply buy repairable products and avoid unrepairable ones

      The free market only works with a low barrier of entry. In many cases what you propose doesn't exist.

  • toss1 a day ago

    Right To Repair is a fundamental of freedom from oligarchy.

    It is literally the question of who owns the things we buy. Or, are we forever just de-facto renting those things, while sending all the data to the corporate overlords?

    It seems obscure, but is a key element of freedom and democracy.

    • Bender a day ago

      If I am renting a thing I expect free repairs forever and they should expect to hear from me any time my rental devices is not doing what I expect it to do. If that is not included in the rental fee then I need not use that device and they should expect it returned covered in animal feces.

      • toss1 a day ago

        Exactly.

        If I am renting it, then anything goes wrong, they either fix it immediately on the spot, or promptly swap it out for an equivalent unit.

    • knollimar a day ago

      but you see, you own the hardware, but have no permission to modify the software I put on it >:)