GPT‑Rosalind for life sciences research

(openai.com)

37 points | by babelfish 4 hours ago ago

4 comments

  • Cynddl 14 minutes ago

    Is it me or they very carefully do not report performance on GPT-5.4 Pro, only the default GPT-5.4? They also very carefully left Anthropic models out of their comparison.

    I went back to the BixBench benchmark which they mentioned. I couldn't find official results for Anthropic models, but I found a project taking Opus 4.6 from 65.3% to 92.0% (which would be above GPT-Rosalind) with nearly 200 carefully crafted skills [1]. There also appears to be competitive competitor models with scores on par with this tuned GPT.

    [1] https://github.com/jaechang-hits/SciAgent-Skills

  • furyofantares an hour ago

    I'm all for naming things in honor of Rosalind Franklin, but this seems like incredible misplaced hubris instead.

    • peyton 14 minutes ago

      > GPT‑Rosalind is now available … for qualified customers …

      It’s kind of gross to make money off her name (if that’s what’s happening) posthumously. It’s a complicated story anyway. IIRC her sister referred to it as “the Cult of Rosalind” when people were cashing in on books about her.

      • bombcar 9 minutes ago

        I'd rather the AI companies make up names, or name their products things like "Clod" than use my name (if they were to ask) - as no matter how good it looks today eventually it'll be some form of laughingstock.