Show HN: Is Hormuz open yet?

(ishormuzopenyet.com)

274 points | by anonfunction 5 hours ago ago

124 comments

  • Jeremy1026 4 hours ago

    The data being ~4 days delayed does kind of make this less useful. It is a nice concept and cool to see the historical data though. Just think the domain and the large "NO" doesn't really fit with the lack of current data.

    • anonfunction 4 hours ago

      Totally agree, I put some text and tried to make it clear. My first intention was to find some live ship tracking API and see how many ships cross the strait, but they were all hundreds of dollars a month, and behind enterprise contact forms.

      • Jeremy1026 4 hours ago

        I've done some small scale ship tracking in the past, and yeah, anything beyond finding a specific ship while it is near the shore is stupid expensive.

    • anonfunction 3 hours ago

      What do you think of adding prediction market data to the indication? So basically there's this:

      https://polymarket.com/event/strait-of-hormuz-traffic-return...

      My approach would be if that jumps up to 75%+ it would change to YES. And if we get into May they have one for then too:

      https://polymarket.com/event/strait-of-hormuz-traffic-return...

      You can actually see in the last 24 hours it jumped up with the ceasefire and Iran saying they would open it and fell back with reports it's been shut down again easlier today.

      Edit: I added this, I can see a few downvotes, happy to discuss here or in the github repo if anyone has strong feelings on it!

      • killingtime74 2 hours ago

        i didnt downvote you but why wouldn't i just go to Polymarket directly for this

        • anonfunction 2 hours ago

          I mean you obviously could, the url is a little harder to remember and it doesn't have crossing data. This was just a small fun project I did, so you're free to do whatever you like. The reason I thought of using polymarket data is I didn't have live ship tracking data which is what I originally intended to use.

  • foresterre 3 hours ago

    According to the Financial Times (1), the straight is "open" but Iran is extorting fees for passing ships.

    > "Iran will demand that shipping companies pay tolls in cryptocurrency for oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz, as it seeks to retain control over passage through the key waterway during the two-week ceasefire."

    If they really will start doing so for all shipping, that would be odd since the straight itself is in Oman's territorial waters. Even so, the UNCLOS convention (2) requires free transit:

    > Article 44 > Duties of States bordering straits > > States bordering straits shall not hamper transit passage and shall give appropriate publicity to any danger to navigation or overflight within or over the strait of which they have knowledge. There shall be no suspension of transit passage.

    It would be unprecedented and unlawful, but I guess previous actions of Israel, the US and Iran have shown our world is beyond adhering to laws and agreements now.

    (1) https://www.ft.com/content/02aefac4-ea62-48db-9326-c0da373b1... (2) United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea: https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unc...

    • femiagbabiaka 3 hours ago

      Oman and Iran are splitting the fees RE: the statements by Iran.

      • AnimalMuppet 3 hours ago

        But collected by Iran, not by Oman. Which is weird, if it's really Oman's territorial waters.

      • FrustratedMonky 2 hours ago

        And Trump.

        Didn't Trump float the Idea of a joint venture with Iran on the Fees?

        Amazing, that once you could make money on a toll, Trump was "there is profit in peace? lets get this peace thing going"

    • anonfunction 3 hours ago

      It's super hard to tell what's actually happening. Because I've seen other reports that Iran state media halted traffic earlier today, as reported by Washington Post[1]:

      > With Trump and Iran each claiming victory, but still far apart on key issues, traffic in the Strait of Hormuz remained at a standstill Wednesday.

      1. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2026/04/08/trump-iran-w...

      • femiagbabiaka 2 hours ago

        That's because Israel killed hundreds of civilians in Lebanon today.

  • elSidCampeador 4 hours ago

    I believe NASA / EU provide daily satellite imagery for free (which is of relatively high quality too). I wonder if there's a way to take that data, and training some kind of image recognition model that figures out "movement" or something to the same end? Would be cool to see

  • namewithhe1d 3 hours ago

    OP, DM me and I'll get you a persistent key for this data. Not from MarineTraffic

  • tomtomtom777 3 hours ago

    This is a nice overview, but please remove the PolyMarket indicator. It is an obscene prediction mechanism as it creates horrible financial incentives to a war situation. Its degenerate effects have been featured here before. [1]

    Let's not condone "measurements" that are effectively ways for people to gain money on important political decisions, affecting the lives of many people.

    (1) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47397822

    • DaedalusII 2 hours ago

      why dont UK start enforcing the Marine Insurance Act 1745 to combat this or the Life insurance act maybe 1775

      this law literally make it illegal to gamble on marine risk that you do not have direct economic interest in

      • colechristensen an hour ago

        Are they? Is there a prediction market available in the UK which allows you to place these bets? They're regulated like gambling there.

    • voidfunc 33 minutes ago

      People don't matter, only outcomes

    • zeofig an hour ago

      I agree polymarket is "bad", but it's also highly relevant and should absolutely be included in this web page.

      • afavour an hour ago

        Why is it highly relevant? It’s a bunch of people betting on the outcome.

        • furyofantares 44 minutes ago

          I've spent years watching prediction markets and finding them to be, by a wide margin, the most accurate way for me to understand the world. It is not remotely close.

          It sucks that they're going mainstream, providing incentives to bad actors to profit from their power, and it sucks that they've gone so heavily for the predatory gambling market to boot.

          I really hate this duality.

          • verdverm 28 minutes ago

            > the most accurate way for me to understand the world

            Are you sure it's not survivorship bias or similar? I've seen multiple trend lines that are very confident only to switch to the opposite outcome at the very end.

            • pgodzin 4 minutes ago

              Are you sure you're not the one seeing the survivorship bias? Something that is 10% likely to happen ends up switching to the opposite outcome at the very end 1/10 times. There are thousands of prediction markets up at any given time, so there are going to be plenty of examples of unlikely events happening.

              But there is plenty of research on how well-calibrated they are. For example, https://polymarket.com/accuracy

              • verdverm a minute ago

                Prediction markets, like many other micro-financialization trends, is unhealthy for society. I'm not going to trust research from the very company selling the product. History provides ample examples of how that works without the need to gamble on it.

    • nodesocket 2 hours ago

      By this logic would you also consider trading OIL (USO) and Palantir a "obscene" market.

      • tomtomtom777 2 hours ago

        Actually yes. I put my money in things I would like to see shape the future, which I think is what investment should be about: shaping the future.

        But disregarding this admittedly niche attitude; it's not the same thing. If you're opening bets on the ships being bombed before a certain date, you're opening incentives for people to do so. Although buying OIL or Palantir is morally questionable, it does not create such direct incentives.

        • trhway an hour ago

          >you're opening incentives for people to do so

          how about short-selling of stocks, isn't it the same thing? I'd even argue that sinking one ship affects say 10 people of the crew who most probable will survive in the warm Gulf waters whereis sinking a company may affect many people life outcomes probably causing a number of indirect deaths. CDS of 2008 would be similar example.

          >buying OIL or Palantir is morally questionable, it does not create such direct incentives

          it creates direct incentives to suppress competitors - wind and solar energy for OIL, and whoever Palantir competitors are.

          Wrt. "Hormuz open" - does the "open" definition includes the new fee Iran would be taking for the strait traverse (something like $1/barrel, nice for Iran, how come that they had't implemented such an idea before? one can only wonder)

          • tomtomtom777 an hour ago

            > how about short-selling of stocks, isn't it the same thing?

            Yes. That's why it's illegal to short-sell your stocks just before you announce that your company is broke.

            There are no such regulations when betting on a bomb dropping on a boat.

        • nodesocket 2 hours ago

          Shaping the future for “good” is not investing. That is ESG and if you value capital and capital appreciation ESG has been proven not to be a solid strategy. See also altruistic capitalism with such moral people as Sam Bankman-Fried, Elizabeth Holmes, Trevor Milton and Adam Neumann. Solid list of moral people shaping the future.

          • sharmajai an hour ago

            Who said investing is _only_ for "capital and capital appreciation"? It can also be for social good.

          • tomtomtom777 an hour ago

            Wow. I am not sure how to respond to this as you seem to have a completely different mindset. You mean to say it is "proven" not to be a solid strategy as in not maximizing profit?

            Surely, you acknowledge that funding something is a rather direct way of actively supporting it. It is your money and your choice of what you choose to invest it in, and thus how you choose to shape the future. If you buy OIL to make money, you are still responsible for the additional investment made in oil, and are still shaping the future, whether you like it or not.

            • nodesocket 12 minutes ago

              > It is your money and your choice of what you choose to invest it in, and thus how you choose to shape the future.

              Absolutely, but I believe you are conflating investing vs donating. The literal definition of investing is:

              > Allocating money (or capital) with the expectation of generating a return or profit over time.

            • Invictus0 19 minutes ago

              The ticker is USO, not OIL, and it's abundantly clear that you have no idea how it works.

      • auntienomen an hour ago

        The problem with prediction markets is fundamentally that they're unregulated.

        Modern equities and futures markets are highly evolved and rather carefully regulated systems. We've spent centuries learning what the failure modes are and how to guard against them. It's never perfect, it's never going to be perfect -- it's fundamentally a voting system -- but in general, we get liquidity and price discovery at a relatively low cost, while avoiding fraudulent and evil behavior like wash trading and criminal profit laundering.

        These new "prediction markets" have been put in place without any of those hard-earned protections. And surprise, they're rife with dirty trick and dirty money.

        • nodesocket an hour ago

          Agree 100% that prediction markets are the wild-wild-west with no insider trading protections, pump and dump, and no oversight. It’s perverting the wisdom of the crowd and efficient market thesis.

      • foxes 2 hours ago

        Yes

      • Octoth0rpe 2 hours ago

        Yep

      • mvdtnz 2 hours ago

        Oil futures or any other commodity purchase that doesn't result in the buyer taking actual physical ownership of what they purchase is an obscene gambling market with perverse incentives yes correct.

        • isubkhankulov 2 hours ago

          How will commodity producers (oil companies, farmers) hedge their risk / stabilize their prices without speculators and their “perverse incentives”?

          • DaedalusII 2 hours ago

            banana brains like OP will design a government that doesnt have natural price discovery and we will all end up driving Lada and with unstable prices and hunger

          • broken-kebab an hour ago

            We will gather special people, very wise, and completely honest. They'll form a committee, and we will call it Gosplan, comrade!

        • DaedalusII 2 hours ago

          by this logic investing in SAFEs is obscene gambling with perverse incentives and we should shut down the venture capital industry

      • micromacrofoot 2 hours ago

        objectively so

      • antonvs 2 hours ago

        Why would you not? Unless you literally don't care about damaging our planet and civilization in the interests of your own personal profit.

        • colechristensen an hour ago

          At this point efficient pricing of energy is a strong motivator for environmental causes. Solar is ridiculously cheaper than fossil fuels and not subject to geopolitical risk. And once you have solar panels you've got energy for decades.

          Carbon-related environmentalism and greed now go hand in hand.

    • FrustratedMonky 2 hours ago

      > "obscene"

      And yet, it is the wisdom of the crowds. The crowds being obscene.

      Aren't we all constantly hitting re-fresh for updates, and making predictions.

      The prediction markets are just consolidating that 'desire'.

      • tomtomtom777 2 hours ago

        Well, it would be if everyone betting wouldn't have an influence on the outcome. That's "wisdom of the crowds". But what if the people putting money on the Strait being closed are the same that close them? Surely, that's no longer the wisdom of the crowds at play. Just perverse incentives.

        • FrustratedMonky 2 hours ago

          I agree. Maybe an un-expected outcome.

          Who could have foreseen that a government/person would actually blatantly start a war, and manipulate bombing raids in order to manipulate a market, without being charged with a crime himself.

          In sports betting, it seems obvious if a player throws a game.

          In a war? Surely nobody would do this, right? Who could imagine it.

          • antonvs an hour ago

            > Who could have foreseen

            Economists. They even have a term for this, dating back to the late 1800s: "moral hazard".

            Polymarket creates moral hazard when participants can profit from outcomes they can influence.

          • verdverm 22 minutes ago

            > In sports betting, it seems obvious if a player throws a game.

            On the other hand, since you can bet on individual pitches, you no longer have to throw the game, just the right pitch at the right time.

            https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/46917665/mlb-betting-gua...

            https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/two-current-major-leagu...

            The focus on making money above all else, as a cultural dynamic, is degrading the human experience. It increasingly seeps into more aspects of our lives and is part of the broader Trustpocalypse.

          • tomtomtom777 2 hours ago

            You don't have to imagine some giant conspiracy. Fact is, that everyone can make a bet, and there are a lot of people with knowledge and influence in the political decisions made.

            In sports, at least the outcome is only effected by the sportsmen. Here, who knows which and how many people have inside knowledge and influence that they can use that to their financial advantage?

            • FrustratedMonky 2 hours ago

              Yeah. I have to agree. My view has changed in last week.

              I never imagined that markets could be so corrupted by those in power, without some other consequences somehow balancing out. Like being arrested, or removed from office.

              Forget PolyMarket. We literally have bets being made on oil futures, directly before a tweet by the president. Openly profiting on direct minute by minute manipulation. Openly corrupt.

      • heavyset_go 2 hours ago

        Putting bounties on people's heads and public lynchings are the wisdom of crowds and its obscenity in action.

        • FrustratedMonky 2 hours ago

          Humans need entertainment.

          Running Man was a prediction, coming true.

  • alerter 5 hours ago

    I work for a consultancy that does vessel tracking as one of its main products, and yeah it's expensive! afaik they have remote teams with sensors at key points and a bunch of people using AI/software to manage things like GPS spoofing. So it's all pretty guarded proprietary stuff.

    Great bit of topical datavis here.

  • bl4ckneon 5 hours ago

    Very cool! I love one off intresting sites like this. Thanks for building it and talking a little bit about where the data comes from etc.

    On the note of Ai agent getting the data for you, could you not just build a chrome extention that intercepts/read the api response and then uploads it to whatever ingest endpoint you have? You could probably just call their api end points they use on the page as well but not sure what protections they have so might be a bit tricky. A custom chrome extention could do it though if they have protections.

    • anonfunction 5 hours ago

      Their APIs are protected by cloudflare, I didn't want to circumvent that. Also I dont really want to make a chrome extension or have a browster tab open, if that's what you meant? I've already made a cron style agent framework[1] so that's what I'd probably reach for since they can actually open the browser and inspect the network traffic to grab the json.

      1. https://botctl.dev/

      • Klonoar 5 hours ago

        How is doing it via agent not circumventing it?

        • anonfunction 4 hours ago

          I think I was just spit-balling what would be possible, rather than what I intend to do. As mentioned elsewhere I'm hoping to get an API key from one the data providers, I even reached out to the api behind marinetraffic.com, https://www.kpler.com/product/maritime/data-services to see if they would sponsor the project.

          This was just something I built on a whim, but I appreciate your comment and took it to heart!

  • ggm 5 hours ago

    Maps can be so misleading. It looks like a dredging operation in Omani waters could alleviate this, if we'd started decades ago.

    Moving to a topographic view, it becomes clear the neck of land at "two seas view" is narrow, but tall. It would literally be moving a mountain.

    Panamax and suezmax boats are smaller than ULCC supertankers.

    Ferdinand De Lesseps time has passed. This would be ruinously expensive. Better to negotiate with rational intent.

    • dylan604 5 hours ago

      > This would be ruinously expensive.

      I bet it could have been done with the money spent on the "war"

      • ggm 5 hours ago

        Yes, but in circumstances where no war is in the offing, digging a giant hole next to 50km of open water begs questions. It would be impossible to get "it's a hedge against the future" over the line.

        The same to a lesser extent applies to pipes. You could construct pipes for gas, for some of the heavier oils and crude (what I read suggests pumping crude long distance is painful, it has to be down-mixed with lighter stuff to make it sufficiently fluid) but the fertilizer? that would mean converting dry to wet and back again (nobody ships fluid weight if they can avoid it) -Or ship the inputs: ammonia, and sulphur in some liquid form, and produce the dry goods on the other side.

        But, I think pipes have a stronger case than a canal: move the things which are amenable to pipes, into pipes, and bury the pipes.

        In times past, this would have been done as a convoy. China and other nations would have stepped to the fore, conducting safe passage with their own ships on the outside edge. But we're not in a world where this kind of thing works for anyone involved. Even offering to cover insurance risk doesn't look to have motivated ship owners to pass. (in times past, the US wouldn't have put itself or it's allies in this position, hence the reference to China)

        Don't be fooled by mental images of what a convoy looks like: ships like these maintain massive separation. There's almost suction between hulls moving at this scale, if they were within 500m of each other there'd be chaos if one had to take any evasive action. In reality (I believe) even a convoy consists of a a lot of discrete, clearly demarked and targetable things, not a large mass you can "hide" in.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_traffic_separation_sch... (and a lot of links off this)

        • analog31 5 hours ago

          We could have spent the money on windmills without raising any suspicions.

          On the other hand, fertilizer is fluid -- either ammonia or ureal ammonium nitrate.

          • ggm 4 hours ago

            If the fertiliser production has a point in manufacture when the fluid is amenable to transport, then for sure, that would make sense.

            And you are right, if the same amount of capital and energy was invested in Solar/Wind as in Oil, we'd be in a totally different world. It's cents to dollars, considering the size of the tail AND the current investment.

            Here in Australia the problem is the royalty stream to the states. Oil and Gas windfalls when the price of equivalent supply (brent crude I believe for oil, not sure what LNG world price defines the limit) hits $100 is just amazing. The revenue stream to the states is enormous. Their motivation to transfer money into alternatives, instead of sucking on the teat, is zero. States without significant oil revenue seem to do more (SA) -States isolated from the national grid seem to do more (WA) but a site with both high insolation, and good wind, but also massive oil, gas and coal fields (Qld) does as little as possible. It's political reductionism. The crony economy is huge, Mining funds the government and the government reflects mining sector interests over all others.

    • acomjean 2 hours ago

      It always amazed me they made ships that just fit the Panama canal. I went though the locks years ago, it was quite a trip (and how a friend got met to go on a cruise)

      https://aramcomjean.smugmug.com/Panama-Canal/i-94PDM8F/A

  • truelson 5 hours ago

    Really liked this. Made me laugh even if not intentionally funny.

    Also, given how markets and news cycles are moved with words not actions these days, I really like this site.

    There are still so many misaligned interests; this is a much tougher situation that may get some local stability for a period, but will likely return to chaos again.

    • tehjoker 3 hours ago

      It’s worth remembering that the chaos is fully coming from America and Israel. The great satan indeed.

  • 4ndrewl 5 hours ago

    You might want to rethink scraping marinetraffic before you get a call from their lawyers?

    https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/p/terms

    • anonfunction 5 hours ago

      Fair enough, I'm actually not scraping it on any automated cycle currently, I just manually copied the JSON from their site to get some ships on the map.

      There's a few live ship tracking APIs I considered but they are expensive or their free offering just straight up didn't work. I sent a few an email if they would consider sponsoring the project, no replies yet.

          - AISStream.io — https://aisstream.io — Down/not working
          - DataDocked — https://datadocked.com — Ran out of credits on a single failed request
          - VesselFinder — https://www.vesselfinder.com/realtime-ais-data — Enterprise contact form, asked if they wanted to sponsor in exchange for a link
          - MarineTraffic — https://www.marinetraffic.com, their API is like an enterprise contact form, same as above, waiting for response.
  • frogperson 5 hours ago

    https://warescalation.com/ is also a good source of info.

    • starik36 5 hours ago

      It says US-Israel Bloc military deaths - 74. Iran military deaths - 10,500 It has no information what is the source of information. Seems like made up numbers.

  • fraywing 5 hours ago

    Very cool, thanks for sharing!

    What's the threshold function? Do you have graduating `No --> Partially --> Mostly --> Open`?

    Also what's the update cadence?

    • anonfunction 5 hours ago

      So if it's under 25% of the prior year's crossing it goes to NO, otherwise it's counted as open.

      The update cadence kinda sucks because I didn't spring for the $200 a month live ship tracking data, so I'm using https://portwatch.imf.org/pages/cb5856222a5b4105adc6ee7e880a... which lags by 4 days which isn't great for a site like this, but was fine for me on a little side project. Open to other data sources or ideas, of if anyone wants to sponsor an API key (I did reach out to a few vendors already if they would give the project api key in exchange for a link to their site).

      The original idea was to track ships and see how many crossed the strait but as mentioned above I didn't find any free sources so I went with what I did.

  • amusingimpala75 3 hours ago

    Missed opportunity for “arewehormuzyet.com”

  • MiSeRyDeee 5 hours ago

    This will be inherently inaccurate because data was based on public AIS signal, but ships are turning off their AIS to avoid detection.

    > In an attempt to evade detection, many ships appear to be deliberately switching off their tracking system - known as AIS (Automatic Identification System). https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4geg0eeyjeo

    • anonfunction 5 hours ago

      Great point and something I didn't consider, I should make a big disclaimer it's not meant to be fully accurate or live data. Thanks for the comment!

      • MiSeRyDeee 4 hours ago

        not to discredit what you've built though, good work!

  • anonfunction 5 hours ago

    Another funny thing about this was this morning I checked if the domain isthestraitofhormuzopenyet.com was available and it was, and by the time I made the site locally, put it on vercel I went to buy the domain to point DNS to it someone had bought it! I renamed it to the current site url / repo which i think might be a little nicer to type, but crazy that we had same idea on apparently the same day. I was also just telling a friend about simultaneous invention aka multiple discover[1] a few days ago, so another case of the Baader-Meinhof phenomenon[2]!

    1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_discovery

    2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion

    • soco 5 hours ago

      I was also surprised to see that arewegreatyet.com is in use already...

  • dr_robert 5 hours ago

    What did you use for the map ? Mapbox ??

  • insane_dreamer 2 hours ago

    Very cool. I agree with some others that the YES/NO is confusing since we actually don't know due to the lag.

    And wtf is a _fishing_ ship from Panama doing in the middle of the straight?

  • spaghetdefects 4 hours ago

    It was mentioned in this thread and quickly flagged, but Israel broke the ceasefire today by attacking civilians in Lebanon so Iran closed the straight. It was open prior to the ceasefire violation.

    France's Macron actually just commented on this: https://x.com/EmmanuelMacron/status/2041990505760772551

    • YZF 3 hours ago

      1. Israel attacked Hezbollah in Lebanon: https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-launches-largest-airstrike...

      2. There is and was no ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel. There was no violation of the ceasefire between Iran and the US/Israel.

      https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-did-not-agree-...

      Macron: "I reiterated the need to preserve Lebanon’s territorial integrity and France’s determination to support the efforts of the Lebanese authorities to uphold the country’s sovereignty and implement the Hezbollah disarmament plan."

      So Macron and Israel are perfectly aligned. Both are demanding that Hezbollah is disarmed and the Lebanese government will assert its sovereignty. Once that happens there will be no need for Israel to use force but as long as Israeli civilians are bombarded non-stop from Lebanon Israel is going to hit back - hard.

      • spaghetdefects 2 hours ago

        Israel murdered almost 200 innocent people today. They are bombing civilians.

    • xdennis 3 hours ago

      > Israel broke the ceasefire

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but Israel didn't sign any ceasefire. The ceasefire was between Iran and US. Israel separately announced (not part of any deal) that it would stop attacking Iran. It honored that self-imposed limit. Israel attacked Lebanon (Iran's proxy).

    • globalnode 3 hours ago

      israels only option is to get america involved since they cant achieve their goals by themselves. trump unwittingly got a punch in the face last time he let himself get dragged in so doubt hell go 100% in again, maybe just lip service attacks to try and appease israel while backchannel appologising profusely to iran as he does it lol

      edit: actually im likely completely wrong, what i wrote above is what i hope would be the case but sadly in reality the violence will never end and oil prices will go up and up and up. this is just a temporary blip. the fighting will continue until something more substantial happens to sort it out in favour of one side or the other.

  • luxuryballs 5 hours ago

    So apparently the reason they don’t just go for it is due to insurance. Because Iran technically isn’t suppose to just sink a civilian vessel, but the risk is there so the ships are ordered by the owner/stakeholder not to go due to the insurance coverage. Kind of interesting, they could technically call Iran’s bluff but it would mean, they violate the insurance contract and lose coverage? I’m just reading about this so probably not the full picture.

    • roncesvalles 5 hours ago

      The capability is very real. And they don't have to sink the ship, just one Shahed drone exploding on the deck and injuring/killing a sailor is deterrence enough.

      • HiroProtagonist 2 hours ago

        The Shahed drone is a 'set it and forget it' device where you program a stationary target and launch it. It would not work well for moving targets, like ships.

        • FpUser 39 minutes ago

          Russia has been modifying Shahed drones for quite a while. May be they've shared back or Iran got creative on their own

        • worik 2 hours ago

          > The Shahed drone is a 'set it and forget it' device where you program a stationary target and launch it. It would not work well for moving targets, like ships.

          The Iranians are quite handy at modifying their drones....

    • tokai 5 hours ago

      No insurance has been fixed for a while now. Its as simple as shipowners not wanting to lose their boats and their future earnings potential.

      • cwillu 5 hours ago

        And their crews not wanting to lose their lives.

  • seattle_spring 3 hours ago

    Cool! Heads up, you're probably running afoul of some TOS by hiding the map data attributions.

    • anonfunction 3 hours ago

      Ahh, thanks I'll remedy that now, wasn't intentional I'll blame Claude.

  • goodluckchuck 4 hours ago

    I think there’s difference between A) whether ships are traversing the straight, and B) whether the straight is open / closed / could be traversed.

    It’s very well possible that the straight is safe, but the vessels are unnecessarily cautious.

  • stavros 5 hours ago

    I'm not really very up to speed on this, can someone explain how the strait is actually closed? Are the Iranians threatening to sink any ships that pass by, or what? How come any ships don't turn their transponders off and try to make a run for it?

    • roughly 5 hours ago

      > How come any ships don't turn their transponders off and try to make a run for it?

      Because the cost of failure is death and the crew aren’t going to risk it, and the other cost of failure is a couple hundred million dollars in ship and cargo and the insurance companies aren’t going to risk it either. This is like asking why your DoorDash driver wouldn’t just try to run the police blockade to get you your burrito.

    • Quothling 3 hours ago

      Kattegat where I live is probably double the width of Hormuz and if you're in a small ship you can probably sail most of those 140 km. Not without risk, but you'd be relatively safe for the most part. Big ships can't though, so even though there might be 50km on each side of them they could potentially have a shipping lane which is only a few hundred meters wide.

      I can't say that I know anything about Iran, but if we were to close our straits off so you couldn't enter the north sea from the baltic sea then our navy would rapidly deploy various different mines that lay on the bottom on the shallower parts and control the shipping lanes with things like suicide drones. I imagine Iran would do something similar, only they've probably been preparing for it a lot more than we have.

    • MattDamonSpace 5 hours ago

      They’ll sink ships or cause damage with low cost drones or missles

      The strait isn’t wide enough, Iran can see any ships attempting

      • stavros 5 hours ago

        I see, thanks. Looks like the strait is 77 km wide, which isn't one ship's width but probably not wide enough that binoculars wouldn't see everything.

        • cwillu 5 hours ago

          The navigable width where it is deep enough is significantly narrower.

          • stavros 5 hours ago

            Good point, thanks.

    • luxuryballs 5 hours ago

      From what I was reading Iran likely wouldn’t sink a civilian vessel but because the risk is there due to the threat they don’t do it because it would violate the contact for their maritime insurance, meaning even if you had a brave crew and orders to go, you lose all your insurance coverage against the loss if something goes wrong.

    • megous 4 hours ago

      I'm sure tankers are huge and show up easily on naval radars.

  • blobbers 4 hours ago

    IRGC targeting systems have entered the chat.

  • einpoklum 5 hours ago

    Iran (and various news sources) have claimed that the straights are not now, and in fact never have been, closed - provided the relevant ship was not involved/linked to the attacks on Iran, and that it coordinated with Iranian authorities.

    So, it could be that:

    * Iran is lying and that has not actually been an option.

    * A lot of the ships which would otherwise have transitioned are involved with the war somehow.

    * The relevant parties have decided not to coordinate transitions with Iran, for various reasons

    * The data displayed at the link is partial for some reason.

    • sethops1 4 hours ago

      No need for baseless speculation, it's well known that no insurance company is willing to insure transit through the straight while it's an active war zone.

  • LAC-Tech 5 hours ago

    It doesn't matter - Israel was able to ethnically cleanse and occupy large parts of Southern Lebanon, without undue Iranian interference. Mission accomplished for MIGA.

    The "Israel First" administration of the US will happily trade Iran's permanent control of an international waterway for the expansion of Israel.