"While living in the United States, she promoted Iranian regime propaganda, celebrated attacks against American soldiers and military facilities in the Middle East, praised the new Iranian Supreme Leader, denounced America as the “Great Satan,” and voiced her unflinching support for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a designated terror organization."
What a bunch of great individuals! The UN warned, two days ago, that in 2026 the Islamic guards in Iran executed more people already than the average in a year. Some 600 people. That's not even talking about the 30 000+ who were slaughtered for manifesting against the regime.
Does anyone have anything to say to criticize ICE about those removals? I mean, really: what is the argument of those saying that ICE shouldn't deport those who, on US soil, hail the great deeds of islamists terrorists?
That is an important piece of context that isn't mentioned in the linked article. Instead, the state department makes it seem like they were kicked out for espousing opinions that the government doesn't like.
"While living in the United States, she promoted Iranian regime propaganda, celebrated attacks against American soldiers and military facilities in the Middle East, praised the new Iranian Supreme Leader, denounced America as the “Great Satan,” and voiced her unflinching support for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a designated terror organization."
What a bunch of great individuals! The UN warned, two days ago, that in 2026 the Islamic guards in Iran executed more people already than the average in a year. Some 600 people. That's not even talking about the 30 000+ who were slaughtered for manifesting against the regime.
Does anyone have anything to say to criticize ICE about those removals? I mean, really: what is the argument of those saying that ICE shouldn't deport those who, on US soil, hail the great deeds of islamists terrorists?
I don't endorse their views, but "hailing the great deeds of Islamic terrorists" is protected speech.
Lying about your asylum claims (these individuals traveled back to Iran, twice, for vacation) is in fact illegal.
That is an important piece of context that isn't mentioned in the linked article. Instead, the state department makes it seem like they were kicked out for espousing opinions that the government doesn't like.
More: Sounding like a shill for the Iranian regime causes questions about the legitimacy of the asylum claims, completely apart from any travel.