> states generally agree that giving weapons the capacity to select and engage targets on their own could lead to unintended consequences, including serious harms for which no human would be held accountable.
And why ever would that human giver not be held accountable?
> states generally agree that giving weapons the capacity to select and engage targets on their own could lead to unintended consequences, including serious harms for which no human would be held accountable.
And why ever would that human giver not be held accountable?