13 comments

  • pjmlp a day ago

    Microsoft Office, that is.

    They will keep using everything else that is touched by Microsoft.

    Github, Typescript, Windows, Active Directory, Open AI servers on Azure, Visual Studio, possibly contractors using .NET, npm infrastructure,...

    • bradley13 a day ago

      There is an increasing movement to find European or OSS solutions. GitHub can be replaced by GitLab. Azure by any of a number of European cloud services. Some are more difficult, but Visual Studio can at least be replaced by IntelliJ.

      I don't understand why you name things like Typescript. Microsoft may have created it, but afaik they do not assert ownership. You can certainly write Typescript in non-MS IDEs.

      • pjmlp a day ago

        How much Visual Studio can be replaced by InteliJ, depends on the underlying programming stack.

        If it is to write Windows games in C++ that are then consumed in Linux via Proton, is a kind of Phyrric independence.

        Who pumps the money into the Typescript team, and calls the shots on its evolution?

        Naturally you can have your own compiler and trail behind its development, with the sponsorship of the likes of Vercel or Anthropic.

    • 4gotunameagain a day ago

      One step at a time from disentangling from a former ally in decline.

      If only now Germany would decouple from the influence of Israel as well..

      • pjmlp 21 hours ago

        Unfortunately all key FOSS projects depend on former ally companies money, and I don't imagine European replacements for them.

    • adammarples a day ago

      No, they are moving to Linux. Read TFA.

  • faangguyindia a day ago

    I work in india, most village panchayats are running Ubuntu without any issues and we don't pay anyone any money.

  • barrkel a day ago

    I think I've been reading about federal Länder breaking up with Microsoft for the past 15 years.

    (Actually 15 years is mentioned in the article now that I scanned it)

  • bradley13 a day ago

    They have been trying to switch to Linux and LibreOffice for years now. The brakes were applied, not so much for technical reasons, but more because the "right" decision makers were wined and dined by Microsoft. The last thing MS wants is a successful precedent showing that their products are not necessary for government.

    Also, you really have to make a clean break. Users are comfortable with what they know. If you leave the door open to use the old-and-familiar, they will fight changing to the new. Train them on LibreOffice and then take away any and all access to MS Office.

  • vovavili a day ago

    The article is paywalled.

  • aaron695 a day ago

    [dead]