Basically it's about the quality of the code output and scenarios flexibility. Recorders that don't have any AI layer on top produce:
- Brittle selectors
- Dump entire scenario into a single file
- Do not allow any logic besides replaying your steps
Qure writes clean code with properly reusable abstractions like Page Object (or whatever do you have in your existing automation repository). For the team it means less flakiness and less time spent on maintenance
And if we consider AI-powered tools, they require much more steering from the human perspective: describing test in text, forcing agent to follow specific guidelines (e.g. for selectors), asking agent to refactor stuff after main scenario is working. Qure agent handles that out of the box itself
interesting approach with the recording, wondering how well it does in comparison with Selenium recorder / Playwright test generator
Basically it's about the quality of the code output and scenarios flexibility. Recorders that don't have any AI layer on top produce:
- Brittle selectors
- Dump entire scenario into a single file
- Do not allow any logic besides replaying your steps
Qure writes clean code with properly reusable abstractions like Page Object (or whatever do you have in your existing automation repository). For the team it means less flakiness and less time spent on maintenance
And if we consider AI-powered tools, they require much more steering from the human perspective: describing test in text, forcing agent to follow specific guidelines (e.g. for selectors), asking agent to refactor stuff after main scenario is working. Qure agent handles that out of the box itself