28 comments

  • ryandrake 13 minutes ago

    This is nice in that Apple acknowledges that iPhone 6s and iPhone 7 devices still exist and are used. I wish third party developers would read that memo and get with the program. The App Store is becoming a ghost town of "This app stopped supporting your icky old device" warning messages due to app developers abandoning these phones.

  • seam_carver an hour ago

    Available for:

    iPhone 6s (all models), iPhone 7 (all models), iPhone SE (1st generation), iPad Air 2, iPad mini (4th generation), and iPod touch (7th generation)

    iOS 16.7.15 and iPadOS 16.7.15: iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, iPhone X, iPad 5th generation, iPad Pro 9.7-inch, and iPad Pro 12.9-inch 1st generation

  • suprstarrd 2 hours ago

    To be clear: the phone is from 2015, not the exploit chain.

    Related: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/cor...

  • GeekyBear 42 minutes ago

    A security update for an eleven year old phone is pretty wild.

    For comparison, the Nexus 6P was released in the same year as the iPhone 6S. It last received a security update in 2018.

    • VladVladikoff 6 minutes ago

      Only 3 years of security updates for a computer we use every day is criminal. It shouldn’t be shocking that Apple kept patching but rather that Google hasn’t.

  • tech234a an hour ago

    Notably these exploits were originally patched for newer devices in 2023 and 2024. However, the Coruna exploits are now publicly available because some of the IOC URLs mentioned in Google's recent blog post [1] were found to still be live. Jailbreakers are already repurposing the code to make web-based tools [2].

    [1]: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/cor...

    [2]: https://x.com/Little_34306/status/2031823581513204009 (Note: the link in this tweet goes to an exploit page that uses code repurposed from malware)

  • kevincloudsec 27 minutes ago

    patching a kernel exploit on a phone from 2015 is nice until you realize the coruna IOC URLs were still live long enough for jailbreakers to weaponize the code before the patch shipped.

  • thecybernerd 2 hours ago

    I wonder what the active device threshold is for them to make the decision to patch an operating system from a decade ago.

    • ronsor 2 hours ago

      Probably recent active exploitation

  • throwaway85825 an hour ago

    A device can be unsupported yet millions will still use it. The obsolescence business model needs to be legislated away.

    • gruez 44 minutes ago

      Should DEC still be releasing patches for the PDP-11? Apple is probably the better companies out there. Some Android devices (cheap tablets on aliexpress) don't even get a year of updates.

      • throwaway85825 42 minutes ago

        A VM image of the build server would work.

  • nineteen999 32 minutes ago

    Now if they'd just release an update to 26.3.1 (23D8133) which PERMANENTLY broke Apple Carplay for me I'd be happy. It's been getting steadily worse since iOS 26 was released.

    Apple is rapidly becoming the new Microsoft. I mean, Microsoft has fallen so much further, so I guess that just opened up a new gap in the shitty technology spectrum for Apple to descend to.

  • burnt-resistor 2 hours ago

    Still waiting for iOS and iPadOS security updates to 18 as per the tradition of supporting the past 2 generations of OSes rather than this sneaky rug-pull of trying to foist fugly 26 on users who don't want an unusable device.

    This sort of spurious patching and releasing token cheap devices is a form of gaslighting.

    • stock_toaster 37 minutes ago

      Indeed! I was about to post something very similar. Glad I scrolled down a bit.

  • behnamoh 2 hours ago

    Am I supposed to be impressed by this? This is part of the Apple experience: long-term updates in exchange for absurdly high markups up-front. I'd be impressed if the markup got lowered and iDevices still got such updates, but that's not happening.

    • falkensmaize 2 hours ago

      Absurdly high markups? They just released a very good laptop for $599. The Galaxy S26 Ultra is $1299. The OnePlus 15 is $999. A Dell XPS 16 with 32gb ram is over $2000.

      I won’t argue that they charge a premium for memory and nvme, but I have never felt like I overpaid for my MacBooks or iPhones, in part because they last so long.

      • burnt-resistor 2 hours ago

        One anecdotal example doesn't break the pattern. It's a performative ploy.

        • nozzlegear an hour ago

          That's not anecdotal, it literally is the price of the MacBook Neo.

    • colinbartlett 2 hours ago

      Yes because if it helps keep devices in use longer it helps reduce waste and the planetary impacts of a culture of disposable products.

    • cryptoegorophy 2 hours ago

      Well. You can buy iPhone 6S for $50. How much cheaper did you want it?

    • runako an hour ago

      iPhone 17 Pro is $1099, Google Pixel Pro is $999, Galaxy S26 Ultra is $1,299.

      Flagship phones are expensive. Apple mostly just does not make low-spec phones, and cheap phones are generally low-spec (or their makers would charge more).

    • nativeit 2 hours ago

      The bar has become incredibly low, it’s true. I could argue that’s all the more reason for recognizing when these monoliths do the right thing, but I would probably struggle to claim they deserve any of it at this point.

    • cosmic_cheese 2 hours ago

      I mean there’s loads of Android stuff in Apple-adjacent price brackets that haven’t seen the tiniest hint of an update in many years…

  • anshumankmr an hour ago

    This will really help the 10 people still using an iPhone 6S.

    (Still a common W for Apple updates)