30 comments

  • 112233 5 minutes ago

    Just make valid robots.txt and sitemap.xml, please, so I can crawl and update mirrors of the sites I am interested in with least amount of impact on the site.

  • catskull 32 minutes ago

    Plug for feeeed: https://feeeed.nateparrott.com

    It’s my primary hn reader now.

  • wmeredith 2 hours ago

    Boy I hope so. I miss my RSS reader. I'd love to see one made with the modern UX that makes the doomscrolling apps so engaging. (Or maybe I wouldn't.)

    • UtopiaPunk an hour ago

      I'm reading this on Feeder, which a free RSS app I found on F-Droid. Works for me

    • 1123581321 an hour ago

      The Reeder family of RSS apps goes for engaging scrolling on iOS.

    • beached_whale an hour ago

      I'm reading this on my RSS reader right now :)

    • dozerly an hour ago

      I am pretty happy with Readwise’s Reader

    • SanjayMehta an hour ago

      I came here via NetNewsWire. iCloud sync is flakey but that's the only quibble. Oh, and you can't yet export starred articles unless you fiddle with SQL.

  • justinator an hour ago

    Stop trying to make RSS happen again. It's not going to happen again.

    • evolve2k a minute ago

      It’s still happening.

    • Crowberry 21 minutes ago

      I set it up a year or two ago. Now i ready 90 of articles and news through it.

    • XenophileJKO an hour ago

      Actually I would have agreed with you 2 years ago. But now working with AI so much, maybe RSS "is" just the thing we need for some of the distrobution.

      • shevy-java 30 minutes ago

        I'd be happy if AI would disappear, but I quite agree with the prior comment - AI is awful but RSS isn't too terribly useful for many of us either. It depends on the individual of course, some people love using RSS feeds. I don't use them. I find RSS not useful.

      • hombre_fatal 41 minutes ago

        RSS is dead because it’s backwards. It requires everyone you want to follow to implement it since that is the best we could do a decade ago.

        We can do better than that: an LLM can ingest unstructured data and turn it into a feed. You shouldn’t need someone else to comply with a protocol just to ingest their data.

        I don’t get why people keep fantasizing about a system that gave consumers no control. Scrape the website directly. You decide what’s in the feed, not them.

        • skybrian a minute ago

          [delayed]

        • mmsc 24 minutes ago

          > an LLM can ingest unstructured data and turn it into a feed.

          An LLM can try to do that, yes. But LLMs are lossy compression. RSS feeds are accurate, predictable, and follow a pre-defined structure. Using LLMs to ingest data which can easily be turned into an parseable data structure seems strange: use the LLM to do the "next part" of the formula (comprehension, decision making, etc)

          There is also LLMs.txt https://llmstxt.org/ eg https://joshua.hu/llms.txt / https://joshua.hu/llms-full.txt

        • pipeline_peak 37 minutes ago

          LLMs use up tons of energy and water.

          • shevy-java 29 minutes ago

            That is the use case for predicting that RSS will dominate tomorrow?

    • bananaflag 30 minutes ago

      I've been using RSS daily since 2008 (on feedly since 2013)

  • crote an hour ago

    I still mourn the loss of Google Reader.

    There are plenty of RSS reader apps, but there are very few with good cross-device sync - let alone self-hosted cross-device sync.

    • bryanrasmussen an hour ago

      I don't think you could self-host Google Reader, so it sort of feels like these two sentences don't hang together.

  • gorfian_robot an hour ago

    when google reader died, I jumped to TheOldReader. it was great for a long time but has been having challenges lately and I jumped to the Vienna app on macos.

  • whatever1 an hour ago

    Nah it’s just that the content consumers are now LLMs

  • shevy-java 31 minutes ago

    I don't quite use "social media" per se, unless of course hackernews is part of it (which, kind of, is ... anything we can use other people can read or relate to, is kind of social, by definition. I think Facebook etc... tried to claim ownership over the term "social media", and I disagree with this notion). Having said that, I don't use or need RSS, so I don't think there will be a renaissance for RSS for most people.

    I do agree that AI is killing tons of things right now. This monster must be stopped; it is worse than Skynet in that it really, really sucks. Things started to decay before AI took over, though - for instance, Google search has been garbage since years. It was useful before that.

    I used to compare the decay of google search with how youtube search works. You search for, say, "ninja cats". You get some results about cats. Perhaps also ninjas. After like 10 or 20 results, you suddenly get other videos that are totally unrelated, but you may click on it. That's addictive design. People click on it suddenly when it is interesting to them - but this also takes them away from their original search. Something similar happened to google search. The UI is total crap, it shows semi-related videos (I don't want to watch videos when I search for a specific term), some ads for companies (Google is milking it here) and then also useless entries such as "other people searched for sick grannies instead, do you want to search for this as well" and similar UI-ruining components. Without ublock origin I'd be quite lost already - lo and behold, Google killed ublock origin because it threatened their business model (another reason to use ublock origin; we really need to get rid of Google. It is no longer a useful corporation - just greedy).

  • zeusdclxvi an hour ago

    Big if true

  • pipeline_peak an hour ago

    RSS only serves as a backbone of a product. There’s no commenting, summaries a sparse, i don’t even think there’s consistent posting dates.

    These evangelists want to make it sound like all we need to do is get everyone on board with RSS and we’ll all just hold hands and share the web.

    People don’t browse the web, there’s like 10 websites, that’s the whole internet.

    Everything else is just asteroids and abandoned space stations.

  • memonkey an hour ago

    except that it only allows summaries behind paywalls. in many cases you never get the full article

    • colesantiago 3 minutes ago

      Then pay for the content to get access?

    • pipeline_peak an hour ago

      Are you talking about sites that actively support RSS?