One of the horrific elements of 9/11 was that force of compression as the building collapsed basically destroyed bodies beyond even being small parts.
As a result, for years following 9/11 remains ( sometimes very small ) were found and immediately catalogued and DNA tested in the hopes some of the victims would finally have something that could be buried.
It's truly horrific to be unable to tell a family for certain that their loved one is definitely gone. And there are folks from that event who are still entirely missing, no remains found. Their families had to bury empty caskets with a lack of closure.
The slavers in Qatar are the chief financiers of Hamas, so no surprise their news network acts as it defacto propaganda arm.
Hamas documents have shown direct contact between Hamas propaganda chiefs and Al Jazeera news rooms with direct sharing of material such as hostage videos and terrorist body cams
Yes you're right, always remember who writes the article and what their interests are.
AJ seems to be pro-Russia, anti-Israel, anti-USA, pro-Iran islamic "republic".
The islamic republic is all about deception, cutting internet to the whole country and reopening it 3 weeks later heavily filtered.
These type of insane blood libels spread by Al Jazeera are very common in the Arabic speaking world, that's why Al Jazeera is banned in many Arab countries.
Thermobaric bombs are real and even normal bombs can do this. (There’s a WW2 song which ends “and all they could find were spots/hundreds and hundreds of spots.“) Not clear that this is a war crime; war is horrible and bombs are part of it; the question is how indiscriminately they were dropped.
The IDF has responded directly to this story and called it a complete lie.
The "thermobaric bomb" part is the specific claim and it's what has the highest propaganda value. The accusation is that the IDF used some specialized weapon to intentionally "vaporize people".
Qatar's entire national defense strategy rests on propaganda and influence campaigns, they have essentially no military. There's no reason to give any credence or benefit of the doubt.
"blood libel" why do you have to use this term all the time? There is plenty of other words that describe what you want to say: fake news, disinformation, propaganda. Why do the likes of you insist on using "blood libel"?
You are trying to make it all about Jews, but they aren't any more special than any other people/religion on the planet. So let's use terms that could be applied to anyone.
Anyway, this is beside the point, reporting on Israel's atrocities and its genocide in Gaza has been accurate for the most part, unlike the lies coming out of Israeli government or IDF.
In the current context, OP's use of "insane blood libel" is a very efficient way to communicate his interpretation of the article. And probably his cultural/political background and worldview. And his emotions on the subject.
The terms you've suggested would, at best, be far less efficient for that purpose.
One of the horrific elements of 9/11 was that force of compression as the building collapsed basically destroyed bodies beyond even being small parts.
As a result, for years following 9/11 remains ( sometimes very small ) were found and immediately catalogued and DNA tested in the hopes some of the victims would finally have something that could be buried.
It's truly horrific to be unable to tell a family for certain that their loved one is definitely gone. And there are folks from that event who are still entirely missing, no remains found. Their families had to bury empty caskets with a lack of closure.
It's a pretty horrid thing.
Huh, hasn't thought of that. Israel sure loves evaporating people.
It really depresses me that there is so much emphasis on arms and weapons startups now days.
Even some financed by Y Combinator.
The thing about weapons is that these startups will have no control in what circumstances they are used.
The hypocrisy is people coming here and claiming that such things happening in the world disturb them.
The world would definitely be a safer place if everyone was a pacifist.
The slavers in Qatar are the chief financiers of Hamas, so no surprise their news network acts as it defacto propaganda arm.
Hamas documents have shown direct contact between Hamas propaganda chiefs and Al Jazeera news rooms with direct sharing of material such as hostage videos and terrorist body cams
https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/app/uploads/2025/10/E_098_...
Yes you're right, always remember who writes the article and what their interests are.
AJ seems to be pro-Russia, anti-Israel, anti-USA, pro-Iran islamic "republic". The islamic republic is all about deception, cutting internet to the whole country and reopening it 3 weeks later heavily filtered.
I can never believe them or any of their allies.
Hey look - we couldn't find all the children that Hamas says Israel killed. They must have been vaporized! Al Jazeera or The Onion?
They must have been terrorists… (sarcasm)
"US-supplied thermal and thermobaric munitions burning at 3,500C have left no trace of nearly 3,000 Palestinians"!!!
How much hate must you have to colonize and continually murder it's inhabitants, that you vaporise children then make TikToks mocking those deaths.
These type of insane blood libels spread by Al Jazeera are very common in the Arabic speaking world, that's why Al Jazeera is banned in many Arab countries.
Thermobaric bombs are real and even normal bombs can do this. (There’s a WW2 song which ends “and all they could find were spots/hundreds and hundreds of spots.“) Not clear that this is a war crime; war is horrible and bombs are part of it; the question is how indiscriminately they were dropped.
The IDF has responded directly to this story and called it a complete lie.
The "thermobaric bomb" part is the specific claim and it's what has the highest propaganda value. The accusation is that the IDF used some specialized weapon to intentionally "vaporize people".
Qatar's entire national defense strategy rests on propaganda and influence campaigns, they have essentially no military. There's no reason to give any credence or benefit of the doubt.
"blood libel" why do you have to use this term all the time? There is plenty of other words that describe what you want to say: fake news, disinformation, propaganda. Why do the likes of you insist on using "blood libel"?
Because it is a blood libel. That's why I used the term.
Accuracy in language is a trait of high civilization which is why leftists and Islamists always try to destroy the meaning of words.
Blood libel means harvesting blood for rituals. It has nothing to do with dropping bombs. Which Israel does, what's the controversy here?
"Blood libel" is a term that applies more broadly than that[1] and this propaganda piece by Al Jazeera is very clearly a blood libel.
1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47001973
Why do you say it is propaganda?
You are trying to make it all about Jews, but they aren't any more special than any other people/religion on the planet. So let's use terms that could be applied to anyone.
Anyway, this is beside the point, reporting on Israel's atrocities and its genocide in Gaza has been accurate for the most part, unlike the lies coming out of Israeli government or IDF.
"Blood libel" is a term that isn't restricted to matters concerning Jews, but obviously you are an antisemite so that is your focus.
The huge story about mass graves of Indigenous people found near Catholic churches in Canada was a blood libel (i.e. it was a complete lie).
https://www.mercatornet.com/canada_s_mass_graves_scandal_is_...
> but obviously you are an antisemite
I have Jewish blood in me, you moron. I was raised by a Jew.
For those unfamiliar with that phrase: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/blood_libel
In the current context, OP's use of "insane blood libel" is a very efficient way to communicate his interpretation of the article. And probably his cultural/political background and worldview. And his emotions on the subject.
The terms you've suggested would, at best, be far less efficient for that purpose.