17 comments

  • wpm a day ago

    Subtitles are parsed by their LLMs for the pointless summaries placed right below the video and for all the other boring, dumb stuff YT does with AI.

    See: https://youtu.be/NEDFUjqA1s8 (Poisoning AI with ".ass" Subtitles)

    • kingstnap a day ago

      They aren't useless, it's nice for finding timestamps of things, especially in long content like talks.

      • wpm 5 hours ago

        So...something you could do with the browser's built-in ability to parse text files, which YouTube could simply serve the subtitles to you as?

    • aurareturn a day ago

      Is it pointless? I find myself asking for summaries of videos more and more often.

      • wpm 5 hours ago

        You should find yourself asking if those summaries are actually accurate, faithful summaries of the video content at all.

        Like, is reading a digest version of War and Peace the same thing as War and Peace?

      • expedition32 a day ago

        Ha hilarious all these content creators started making long rambling videos to make more advertising money.

        I have always maintained that I can read text faster but literacy is going down the drain.

  • ggm a day ago

    I could believe this is a filter designed to simplify conformance to some YT standard.

    I could believe this is a side effect of something else.

    I could believe its a problem with some output devices (sw) of the nature of "oh I'm ASCII I can't handle UTF-8 encoded data" which doesn't have a good default.

    Is there some more direct profit/IPR motivated approach which directs this format of all others should be removed?

    • altairprime a day ago

      It differentiates human-created content from AI-created content in a space where AI can’t perform competitively at all. So, just as with Crunchyroll, better to kill the complex human artistic subtitles so that people don’t get used to their boring “could be machine, could be human, who cares” slop (and, as a bonus, so that human moderators aren’t required to evaluate whether the subtitles are offensively shaped).

      • CamperBob2 a day ago

        It differentiates human-created content from AI-created content in a space where AI can’t perform competitively at all.

        Well, that certainly remains to be seen.

        • altairprime a day ago

          Indeed. Fortunately, “cannot” is present tense, not future tense.

  • ompogUe a day ago
    • quietsegfault a day ago

      I mean, it’s sort of a vector. The malware itself can only be executed if you click a suspicious .lnk file. The moral here isn’t that subtitles are a “vector”, but to not indiscriminately run scripts.

  • a day ago
    [deleted]
  • efilife a day ago

    this just keeps happening over and over. And I can't find any logical reason why they are doing this. Surely you can't lose money due to supporting a colorful subtitles format? Ditch youtube. You most likely do NOT need it

    • its-summertime a day ago

      They still support multiple formats with color information

      • slowdog a day ago

        Even still, it's not as much information and doesn't excuse deleting creators work without any warning.

  • pfannkuchen a day ago

    > Sure, it's not officially supported or even documented

    Conspiracy, or P3 bug?