28 comments

  • tw04 a few seconds ago

    Did someone actually think scooters were new? We had them growing up, I thought it was common knowledge the only thing novel about e-bikes and e-scooters were the lithium ion batteries and electric motors giving adequate runtime and performance.

    You could drive a moped before you turned 16 which got a lot of teenagers in my hometown to and work and sports in the summer when their parents couldn’t.

    But they were slow, noisy, and smelly compared to a modern ebike.

  • hylaride 2 hours ago

    > The e-scooters that clutter up pavements may seem like a new thing, but a hundred years ago, there were already people zooming around London on powered scooters.

    The problem is that we've given so much space to automobiles that there's no room for anything else (bikes, scooters, etc). Pedestrians have been given a sliver only because drivers need to walk between parking and their destination. This is true even in cities where the majority of people don't even drive!

    • sheepscreek 2 hours ago

      Probably cause modern logistics, especially last mile logistics, is dependent on trucks/delivery vans/etc. So even though folks in a local area might like to walk around, their groceries won’t make it to the stores and packages won’t get to their homes without a robust road network.

      I think Bacerlona hits a good compromise. The city has the concept of a superblock, which is a few city blocks grouped into one calm zone. Most car traffic stays on the streets around the outside, the perimeter of the superblock. Inside, driving is restricted and only at low speeds where allowed, so people and bikes get the space. So deliveries and residents can still but only slowly.

      That’s far from the only example - many cities in Asia follow a similar model.

      • ajb 2 hours ago

        London is edging in that direction with the introduction of "low traffic neighbourhoods". Basically this involves preventing vehicles using them as a through route, by limiting some connections to only emergency vehicles. The problem is that it's also annoying for residents as it means the allowed entry/exit routes aren't necessarily in the direction you need to go. Does Barcelona have a smarter method?

        • alistairSH an hour ago

          Isn’t the presumption that residents walk/bike/transit far more often than drive?

          • michaelt 19 minutes ago

            In the most central (and expensive) parts of London - “Zone 1”, where all the famous landmarks are - that is indeed a safe assumption.

            But go to a less central area, like Hendon and you’re still very much within London, but every street is lined on both sides with parked cars.

          • ajb 39 minutes ago

            That's unevenly distributed. Lots of people in London do walk or use public transport, but you still need many delivery drivers, tradespeople, etc and it doesn't make sense for them all to live outside the city. And people who don't usually drive occasionally need to use a vehicle, and then it's more stressful because you aren't used to having to know where the vehicular entrances are. It's too simplistic to just make provision for the majority and assume that it doesn't matter what the second order effects are.

          • hylaride an hour ago

            There is still pushback. I live in Toronto and when central businesses are canvassed about streetscape changes they overwhelmingly are against removing parking, access for cars, etc. They assume that 90% of their customers drive to them, but it turns out that it is closer to 10% for most of them.

        • bluescrn an hour ago

          LTNs and pedestrianised areas are great for criminals on illegal high-powered e-bikes. Purpose-built getaway routes.

      • hylaride 44 minutes ago

        > Probably cause modern logistics, especially last mile logistics, is dependent on trucks/delivery vans/etc. So even though folks in a local area might like to walk around, their groceries won’t make it to the stores and packages won’t get to their homes without a robust road network.

        Totally. Banning automobiles is usually a bad idea, especially for residential zones. Years ago, I remember seeing a presentation about redeveloping a bad public housing block that was built in the 1960s with no auto-access (the assumption being poor people don't have cars), but it turns out that it meant they couldn't even get pizza.

        • potato3732842 7 minutes ago

          >the assumption being poor people don't have cars

          Some number of the people at the time likely thought to themselves "good, this will make it inconvenient for them to get a car that lets them easily get far from their designated area on a whim."

    • crazygringo an hour ago

      > This is true even in cities where the majority of people don't even drive!

      I dunno... in New York City there are an awful lot of bike lanes now:

      https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7355559,-73.9921499,13z/data...

      There's still room for a lot more, but plenty of space has been taken away from automobiles precisely for bikes, scooters, etc. It's trending in the right direction. Especially now that bike lanes are increasingly being designed with parking between the bike land and vehicle lanes.

    • reactordev an hour ago

      But this has been true every hundred years or so as technology changes and those that are building infrastructure know nothing else.

      2000s : Damn these cars clogging up the road!

      1900s : Damn these buggies clogging up the road!

      1800s : Damn these carriages clogging up the road!

      1700s : Damn these horses clogging up the road!

      1600s : Damn these " " " " "

      100BC : Damn these romans clogging up the road!

  • alexwasserman 24 minutes ago

    My father was gifted a pair of these for his 50th birthday, would have been 1989, in London.

    Little ICE scooters. They were a lot of fun and not very safe. We had drunk guests damaging themselves in the street.

    They became toys for my brothers and I, who had plenty of accidents but learnt to ride them reasonably.

    The engines didn’t idle particularly well and had no gears. You had to pull start, hop on and go quickly while reving just enough to idle without it moving. It took practice. You could push start too with some practice, especially once warm.

    Lots of fun, but mileage wouldn’t have been great for serious use and refilling a pain at a regular petrol station. Might have been 2-stroke, I can’t remember. Tiny engine, closer to a strimmer than lawnmower.

    Huge fun though for just bombing around on as a tween and young teen.

    • UniverseHacker a minute ago

      Must have been two stroke, 4 stroke motors are too large and heavy for an application like that.

  • vessenes 18 minutes ago

    Boy I had a liminal moment looking at these photos and videos - this all could easily have been a fun AI media project. In fact, I think the first photo used outpainting (“street background expanded” reads the subtitle).

    I’m enjoying my last year or so of visual media trust, as ephemeral as that is in reality.

  • bondarchuk 2 hours ago

    >"(street background expanded)"

    As in... expanded using generative AI? (The perspective on the lamps is really off unless they're different size lamps)

  • nickdothutton 4 hours ago

    I also like to point out that we had electric powered food delivery services in London from 1932.

    • bluescrn an hour ago

      And the delivery drivers were probably paid more than they are now…

  • jtbayly 2 hours ago

    No way that’s a 15 inch wheel.

  • thenthenthen 3 hours ago

    These are ICE and not electric.