Not really. A lot of Starlink installations, like mine, are strictly for emergency backup purposes. My account stays suspended 99% of the time, but it's reasonable for them to count me as a "customer."
If you have a wide monitor, the CSS can be fixed by removing the background-image from the body, or by adding background-repeat: repeat-y;. (For me there was a beige stripe running through the middle of the text.)
Huston estimates 2.3M Starlink users worldwide while SpaceX reports 8M customers. That's a massive difference.
I'm a Starlink user technically, but haven't had my service enabled for over 3 years. People like me might help account for this discrepancy.
Possibly a lot of those missing ones are military ones that don't want to be counted for security reasons? Just thinking
Or, perhaps SpaceX fudged the nunbers so they look as if they have more users.
Don't want to be a hater in this, I love what SpaceX is doing, but Musk has been known to play PR games, so he's an unreliable narrator at best.
Wouldnt be suprised if they said, we have about 2M users, lets estimate a common household per user, to inflate the numbers.
Not really. A lot of Starlink installations, like mine, are strictly for emergency backup purposes. My account stays suspended 99% of the time, but it's reasonable for them to count me as a "customer."
They are not evenly distributed though, so the density differences isn't that big for the purposes of regional geolocation.
If you have a wide monitor, the CSS can be fixed by removing the background-image from the body, or by adding background-repeat: repeat-y;. (For me there was a beige stripe running through the middle of the text.)