I don’t know what to call this but it’s something like objectivity porn. “Look at me putting the solution before the person.”
The guy who has spent 250 million dollars getting one political party elected, biased his entire persona as dark MAGA and then releases an encyclopedia whose first version is heavily biased towards Republicans and against Democrats, does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.
> Elon Musk has repeatedly pointed to the site’s entries on controversial figures such as U.S. Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy to show the site’s editorial heavy hand. The introduction to Kennedy, for example, immediately labels him a conspiracy theorist.
Pointing out that his primary role is conspiracy theory advocate isn't bias, I'm sorry. Literally his entire schtick is that there's a vast conspiracy in the pharmaceutical industry to cause autism for profit.
It tracks that Musk would take offense at this though, being a crank of the exact same caliber.
I don’t know what to call this but it’s something like objectivity porn. “Look at me putting the solution before the person.”
The guy who has spent 250 million dollars getting one political party elected, biased his entire persona as dark MAGA and then releases an encyclopedia whose first version is heavily biased towards Republicans and against Democrats, does not deserve the benefit of the doubt.
Sometimes a duck is just a duck.
> Elon Musk has repeatedly pointed to the site’s entries on controversial figures such as U.S. Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy to show the site’s editorial heavy hand. The introduction to Kennedy, for example, immediately labels him a conspiracy theorist.
Pointing out that his primary role is conspiracy theory advocate isn't bias, I'm sorry. Literally his entire schtick is that there's a vast conspiracy in the pharmaceutical industry to cause autism for profit.
It tracks that Musk would take offense at this though, being a crank of the exact same caliber.