One thing I don’t like about this, is how it’s all “negative” culturing, and I don’t think that’s sustainable. By ‘negative’ I dont just mean affectually, but like, wouldn’t it be great if instead of “slamming” Netflix, Elon was promoting another show in its place?
Let’s compete on creating things, and not tearing them down.
Interesting choice of example: *Take the recent renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America.” This act changed exactly zero gallons of seawater, affected not one shipping route, and solved no actual problem facing Americans."
The article doesn't acknowledge this "renaming" sprung fully-formed from Trump's brow. I don't believe anyone was agitating for this change, unlike bringing back Confederate general's names for military bases. "Rokeness" has a top-down nature, illustrated by Trump and Elon demandin changes, that the author just ignores.
One thing I don’t like about this, is how it’s all “negative” culturing, and I don’t think that’s sustainable. By ‘negative’ I dont just mean affectually, but like, wouldn’t it be great if instead of “slamming” Netflix, Elon was promoting another show in its place?
Let’s compete on creating things, and not tearing them down.
Interesting choice of example: *Take the recent renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America.” This act changed exactly zero gallons of seawater, affected not one shipping route, and solved no actual problem facing Americans."
The article doesn't acknowledge this "renaming" sprung fully-formed from Trump's brow. I don't believe anyone was agitating for this change, unlike bringing back Confederate general's names for military bases. "Rokeness" has a top-down nature, illustrated by Trump and Elon demandin changes, that the author just ignores.
[dead]