Nothing to see here. Move right along. I'm sure one or two or a handful of repeated incidents don't represent a trend or potential for future fuck-ups.
What is DOGE even doing now? Can we get some status reports on what the DOGE employees are doing every week since they're such proponents of radical accountability?
Destroying things to justify privatization while stealing every detail about us to increase profits and target opponents. Sure, there are HIPAA, secrecy, and confidentiality violations happening but there's no one left to prosecute the criminals when the criminals are the police, COTUS, SCOTUS, and the unitary executive. The only meaningful distinction remaining is patronage vs. outsider.
Officially they are still re-writing the software that runs Social Security. Back in May, they said re-writing >1 millions lines of COBOL would only take a few months.
> But without flashy leadership, DOGE technologists are now quietly cycling into federal agencies, spending days or weeks building products and cutting contracts before cycling out once again. This is all done with little oversight from the White House or the United States DOGE Service (USDS), which these technologists purportedly represent.
> “If a developer can’t keep an API key private, it raises questions about how they’re handling far more sensitive government information behind closed doors,”
It raises additional questions. Plenty of questions already unanswered. Seems likely it's been a shitshow.
Like, "why does this nominal government employee have the API key to XAI"/"why is an active X employee playing such a prominent role in the government"?
External tech workers have been a thing since at least the catastrophe that was the original ACA launch. That "tech surge" was definitely full of more experienced people than the "smart kids" we see in DOGE though.
More worrying is that the article points out at time of writing the key was still valid. Why such a high level key was used in an agent script, why it hasn't been rotated (can't be rotated?) and about a dozen other "whys" point to some rather damning practices.
I get that the idea was to avoid the obscene levels of red tape that can be common in government IT, but the pendulum has clearly swung far, far far too far the other way.
These reports seem increasingly irrelevant. There are surely many people that care and are outraged, but that's about it. Tomorrow the news cycle will have something else, and the 20 year olds scrapping their pants at doge will be yesterday's news.
> DoD is also contracting for $200 million for grok
Somewhat to one side but when up to USD800 million is being spent (Grok, is not the only AI shaped snout at the trough) it's depressing to see the vagueness of the supposed uses [1] (in a five line paragraph this is the most specific description of why that need to spend the money ... "to support our warfighters and maintain strategic advantage over our adversaries")
Nothing to see here. Move right along. I'm sure one or two or a handful of repeated incidents don't represent a trend or potential for future fuck-ups.
What is DOGE even doing now? Can we get some status reports on what the DOGE employees are doing every week since they're such proponents of radical accountability?
Destroying things to justify privatization while stealing every detail about us to increase profits and target opponents. Sure, there are HIPAA, secrecy, and confidentiality violations happening but there's no one left to prosecute the criminals when the criminals are the police, COTUS, SCOTUS, and the unitary executive. The only meaningful distinction remaining is patronage vs. outsider.
Officially they are still re-writing the software that runs Social Security. Back in May, they said re-writing >1 millions lines of COBOL would only take a few months.
https://www.wired.com/story/doge-rebuild-social-security-adm...
Unofficially, they are the worst people so they are probably doing the worst things you can imagine.
Wired also had this recent update, on "DOGE 2.0".
> But without flashy leadership, DOGE technologists are now quietly cycling into federal agencies, spending days or weeks building products and cutting contracts before cycling out once again. This is all done with little oversight from the White House or the United States DOGE Service (USDS), which these technologists purportedly represent.
Just ask Grok with the free key!
the sound of one hand clapping (AI generated)
Jokers, even GitHub auto checks if you push code with a private key.
I doubt it has an integration with grok
> “If a developer can’t keep an API key private, it raises questions about how they’re handling far more sensitive government information behind closed doors,”
It raises additional questions. Plenty of questions already unanswered. Seems likely it's been a shitshow.
Like, "why does this nominal government employee have the API key to XAI"/"why is an active X employee playing such a prominent role in the government"?
External tech workers have been a thing since at least the catastrophe that was the original ACA launch. That "tech surge" was definitely full of more experienced people than the "smart kids" we see in DOGE though.
More worrying is that the article points out at time of writing the key was still valid. Why such a high level key was used in an agent script, why it hasn't been rotated (can't be rotated?) and about a dozen other "whys" point to some rather damning practices.
I get that the idea was to avoid the obscene levels of red tape that can be common in government IT, but the pendulum has clearly swung far, far far too far the other way.
> It raises additional questions
Ones we should be ready to prosecute with official resources come ‘26 and ‘28.
In the meantime, I wouldn’t let him into my country. But the EU will be the EU.
This was the "normalize Indian-hate" guy.
Very interesting that he had to resign from DOGE over this, yet xAI seemingly welcomed him.
Just another example showing that power and persistence does not equal competence.
Once, I can understand, but twice? come on... And the keys were still valid hours later (according to the article)
I regularly expose my AI api keys in my weekly zoom meetings for our AI Playground :)
So far no one has taken me up on them.
Feel free to join as a VIP anytime!
[dead]
These reports seem increasingly irrelevant. There are surely many people that care and are outraged, but that's about it. Tomorrow the news cycle will have something else, and the 20 year olds scrapping their pants at doge will be yesterday's news.
XAI key is potentially root into X (social media), and Tesla via grok, yes?
If so, sounds potentially life threatening.
NTSB might wanna look into that.
Edit: DoD is also contracting for $200 million for grok. Yeah, this is bad. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2025/07/14/elon-mu...
> DoD is also contracting for $200 million for grok
Somewhat to one side but when up to USD800 million is being spent (Grok, is not the only AI shaped snout at the trough) it's depressing to see the vagueness of the supposed uses [1] (in a five line paragraph this is the most specific description of why that need to spend the money ... "to support our warfighters and maintain strategic advantage over our adversaries")
[1] https://archive.ph/p1ZXR#selection-719.61-719.141
There are a lot of classified contracts, services, etc.
That's kind of my point. It is bad And likely no one will be held accountable for it.