Starlink may be lying about speed

(seriousaboutech.com)

12 points | by janandonly 17 hours ago ago

7 comments

  • Bender 4 hours ago

    Use iperf3 on both ends to rule out optimizing results prioritization for speed tests. Watch network stats on both ends to also track retransmits, fast retransmits, lost retransmits, recoveries, locked sockets, etc... Run tests on different ports and test with and without using a VPN such as WireGuard. iperf3 will show losses and retransmits and will allow setting limits on number of threads. Different http protocols can mask or exacerbate these numbers whereas iperf3 will expose the raw traffic stats. Different congestion control algorithms and queue disciplines can also mask or exacerbate numbers. I would also be interested in seeing the stats for civilian vs. active military controlled accounts to see if they get priority which I would expect given low latency is required for drones.

  • phillipseamore 16 hours ago

    Speedtest to ground segment (never really hits the internet) vs speedtest to closest (to the ground station) Cloudflare server.

  • 17 hours ago
    [deleted]
  • jaisio 17 hours ago

    [dead]

  • zeristor 17 hours ago

    Wouldn’t people who were downloading multi gig files be suspicious?

    • undersuit 16 hours ago

      What's suspicious about watching a Twitch or YouTube stream?

      • red369 15 hours ago

        I interpreted this as:

        "Wouldn't people who were downloading multi gig files [become] suspicious [of the claimed speed because it would be obvious to them that it is not correct]?"