Genuine question: how are you so sure this is ChatGPT authored? And do you mean the whole thing is written by ChatGPT, unedited by a human, or do you mean the author used ChatGPT to edit their article?
There is a typical pattern that LLMs follow when writing
things like:
"# What Actually Helped
Here’s a story."
is exactly what I see anytime I ask ChatGPT to generate an article. I guess when you get used to trying to use it to generate content, you become good at identify it.
I'm still not seeing it in this particular article. I really want to know if I'm missing something or it the parent commenter is just being overly dismissive.
Someone should build a SAAS to deterministically generate a blog post and title from a URI so we can automate this. I wonder if they'd change the site rules to deal with it.
Why are we pushing these pure ChatGPT authored blog posts?
Genuine question: how are you so sure this is ChatGPT authored? And do you mean the whole thing is written by ChatGPT, unedited by a human, or do you mean the author used ChatGPT to edit their article?
There is a typical pattern that LLMs follow when writing
things like:
is exactly what I see anytime I ask ChatGPT to generate an article. I guess when you get used to trying to use it to generate content, you become good at identify it.I'm still not seeing it in this particular article. I really want to know if I'm missing something or it the parent commenter is just being overly dismissive.
Bad writing is perennial
As much as I'd like it, it would be inconsequential for YCombinator's portal to ban AI-generated posts.
Because here people just wanna discuss titles, and the title is the whole content in this case - the prompt.
Someone should build a SAAS to deterministically generate a blog post and title from a URI so we can automate this. I wonder if they'd change the site rules to deal with it.