So following that if someone wanted to do a ton of drugs and overdose ... It's on them and not the dealer legally right? Odd how fossil fuel industry seems to get a unique pass on its damages and liability
> "if someone wanted to do a ton of drugs and overdose"
You answer your own questions.
Generally people make their own decisions and must take responsibility for them. This is certainly true for our daily life and lifestyle choices that drive use of fossil fuels, health issues, etc.
So could we in future start trials for crimes against humanity for the anti-nuclear groups like Green parties and all of their members?
The problem with climate science is that in order for any of those people to have a job there has to be a problem to solve
> New estimate: Fossil fuel companies have caused trillions of dollars in damages.
This strikes me as looking for scapegoats and to play the victim.
For instance, if people buy oversized cars just to drive half miles journey it is on them, not on car manufacturers or "fossil fuel conpanies".
So following that if someone wanted to do a ton of drugs and overdose ... It's on them and not the dealer legally right? Odd how fossil fuel industry seems to get a unique pass on its damages and liability
> "if someone wanted to do a ton of drugs and overdose"
You answer your own questions.
Generally people make their own decisions and must take responsibility for them. This is certainly true for our daily life and lifestyle choices that drive use of fossil fuels, health issues, etc.