EuroNews is generally pretty respectable, but it is sad that their cookie/tracking banner isn't compliant. Equally sad that no one at EuroNews management have seen the banner and though: 870 partners seems like 867 to many.
Arguably EuroNews is a strange source for news like this, but companies like Microsoft and Amazon are terrible about communicating outages directly.
The link to continue without agreeing is right at the top with the warning, and not buried somewhere in settings (and especially not sending you to each of the 800 to opt out individually like so many firms helpfully offer).
The thing about this that's troubling is that you saw it and it troubled you.
Most sites linked from HN you don't see that number even though it often numbers in the thousands; and if you do get told, they don't let you use a single click to continue without agreeing.
I was pleasantly surprised how transparent this was, and that I could just disagree and continue, instead of the usual GDPR-dodging dark patterns.
I understand why it is still popular, I first used it at my current job and for the life of me I do not understand how people put up with it. It is one of the worst applications I use in my daily work life.
Almost 20 years ago, I remember getting in an argument with a new manager who was pushing for the company to use Exchange “because that’s what businesses do”
Then about 5 years ago something similar happened at another company when I was against 365. Their argument was “I know it sucks, but that’s microsoft’s preferred way”
There are a lot of people with decision making power that base their decisions solely on marketing material.
Opposing Microsoft products and services is career ending attitude in the enterprise environment. Bill and Steve (the other one) are not such nice guys as many think.
If only there was some way, maybe through decentralization, to ensure that not all of Microsoft Exchange customer where down at the same time. Maybe if there where a self-hosting option, or a partner network that could offer these service. Oh well, guess we'll never know.
> With your agreement, we and our 870 partners use cookies or similar technologies to store, access, and process personal data
!! Surely there's a more respectable source.
Anyway, Outlook is working fine for me here in NZ. This news seems to be a day old: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=MO941162
EuroNews is generally pretty respectable, but it is sad that their cookie/tracking banner isn't compliant. Equally sad that no one at EuroNews management have seen the banner and though: 870 partners seems like 867 to many.
Arguably EuroNews is a strange source for news like this, but companies like Microsoft and Amazon are terrible about communicating outages directly.
On the contrary, it seems compliant?
The link to continue without agreeing is right at the top with the warning, and not buried somewhere in settings (and especially not sending you to each of the 800 to opt out individually like so many firms helpfully offer).
More respectable source - https://x.com/MSFT365Status
How do you evaluate respectability in this case? The icon that meant verified on Twitter now only means that someone paid money to X.
(And of course you can't read it if you're not logged in.)
In this case you can find this X account linked on some Microsoft status pages.
https://status.cloud.microsoft/
Exactly like how you evaluate respectability on any platform including the web. Not like there are reliable checkmarks everywhere you go.
I respect them more. So that’s one data point..
(PS: Poe’s law).
The thing about this that's troubling is that you saw it and it troubled you.
Most sites linked from HN you don't see that number even though it often numbers in the thousands; and if you do get told, they don't let you use a single click to continue without agreeing.
I was pleasantly surprised how transparent this was, and that I could just disagree and continue, instead of the usual GDPR-dodging dark patterns.
Checking in from Oz, Outlook was working fine 30 minutes ago.
If people cared about that they wouldn't be using Microsoft.
So many unfortunately don't have a choice
Looks like global productivity will see a small but positive bump today.
If only Slack could take some of its 0.0x% sometime soon, I might be able to finish off three or four dangling threads.
I understand why it is still popular, I first used it at my current job and for the life of me I do not understand how people put up with it. It is one of the worst applications I use in my daily work life.
Almost 20 years ago, I remember getting in an argument with a new manager who was pushing for the company to use Exchange “because that’s what businesses do”
Then about 5 years ago something similar happened at another company when I was against 365. Their argument was “I know it sucks, but that’s microsoft’s preferred way”
There are a lot of people with decision making power that base their decisions solely on marketing material.
Then you should think yourself lucky that you've never had to use Lotus Notes.
Opposing Microsoft products and services is career ending attitude in the enterprise environment. Bill and Steve (the other one) are not such nice guys as many think.
I only wish it was down... it's all good here in NL.
It was down this morning, producing a plaintext 404 for some endpoints for some reason. Seems like they managed to fix most of it, though.
We're having problems here in NL.
SharePoint Online search is broken too.
SharePoint is broken by default, no?
> SharePoint Online search is broken too.
How could you tell ?
MO941162, not that it gets updated that often.
If only there was some way, maybe through decentralization, to ensure that not all of Microsoft Exchange customer where down at the same time. Maybe if there where a self-hosting option, or a partner network that could offer these service. Oh well, guess we'll never know.
Oh no! Now I won't be able to attend our weekly monday morning meeting! The horror!