68 comments

  • Neil44 2 hours ago

    The article doesn't mention but it seems pretty relevant, Google kicked them from having the Play store etc on their phones a little while back as a result of political pressure so there's really no reason for them to care about Android any more.

    • llm_nerd an hour ago

      The article explicitly cites it in the second last paragraph. It was a bit more than political pressure, though: Huawei was added to the entity list and it would be a crime for US companies or citizens to do business with them.

      • MichaelZuo an hour ago

        That’s clearly not the case though?

        A lot of Huawei gear is still installed and operating, as of today, in US telecom networks.

        Even the pentagon is contracting with many companies using Huawei gear.

        • rickdeckard 15 minutes ago

          Usage of their equipment is one thing, technology export to a blacklisted company is another.

          The telecom providers arguably put quite some pressure to maintain such a distinction, since they purchased and paid for said equipment.

          But for i.e. Google it would have been a crime to provide dedicated technology access (early-access code, Google Services, etc.) for Huawei to then integrate into their products.

        • shrubble 7 minutes ago

          They’re not supposed to be running it!

          There were specific orders to remove Huawei from the telecom network (but yeah they were not followed) in 2019.

          • llm_nerd a minute ago

            It's a pretty big operation to purge all of that legacy gear, so the government made a multi-billion dollar fund to support the removal over time, and I believe gave them until 2025 to finish the purge. And even that isn't exhaustive: They can still operate it after the deadline, they'll just be restricted from various government subsidies and programs.

            So the government didn't flip a switch and tell them to make it disappear. They expected it to be a staggered, eventual process.

        • GTP 20 minutes ago

          I guess it is a crime from the date they were added to the list, but not a crime to keep using devices purchased earlier.

    • lawgimenez an hour ago

      I own a Huawei tablet and yes there is no Play Store. The Huawei app store also will link you to several third party sketchy apk stores.

  • snvzz 3 hours ago

    Notably, this is a microkernel, multiserver operating system[0].

    0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HarmonyOS_NEXT

    • tribaal 18 minutes ago

      Huawei is very present at EuroRust and seem to look for a lot of people to hire.

      I guess it makes sense, I was curious why they would want people to work on e.g. Servo since Firefox is already available on Android... now I know :) Their team there made a pretty good impression for the record, they were knowledgeable and pitched their projects quite well (several of them quite interesting).

    • ChocolateGod 2 hours ago

      I find it interesting how Huawei was able to make a nearly brand new microkernel operating system in a short amount of time, meanwhile Google with Fuchsia...

      Despite it being Huawei, I am interested to see how well the OS plans out.

      • scrlk an hour ago

        Fuchsia was a success for its developers: they created something new and shiny at Google, which would allow them to receive their promotion.

        HarmonyOS NEXT is probably a lot more existential for Huawei.

      • rfoo an hour ago

        Honestly, I think Fuchsia was fine, there's just no reason to deploy it yet.

    • shrubble 3 minutes ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that L4 kernel was an inspiration.

    • markus_zhang 2 hours ago

      Looks like a whole new OS to find exploitation for. Interesting.

  • DeathArrow 3 hours ago

    >Unlike previous iterations of HarmonyOS, HarmonyOS NEXT no longer supports Android apps.

    That's kind of big, HarmonyOS would not be just another Android flavor anymore.

    > we're sorry to report that Huawei told us it currently has no plans to offer Harmony OS NEXT outside of China

    That's to be expected. If you live outside of China and don't know Mandarin, the apps are not usable.

    • Throw83489i7 2 hours ago

      > If you live outside of China and don't know Mandarin

      Not just that, China has super apps that integrate everything from payments, food delivery, taxi, social media... To single application. Integrating this app directly into OS as a launcher (or shell) kind of makes sense.

      • numpad0 an hour ago

        Are you sure those everything aren't just bunch of third party janky WebViews, only relevant because of private chat app account moat?

        ("third party" and "private" parts are relevant, IMO, otherwise Twitter superapp-ification had happened years ago)

        • Throw83489i7 13 minutes ago

          Maybe, but that is just implementation detail.

          My point is that 3td party apps do not make much sense in China. They are useless without support from super app

      • jmclnx 2 hours ago

        Sounds nice at first until you look to see what places these apps are also linked too in mainland China.

        But not that it matters in the end considering the chaos the US has where eventually everyone gets to see what we do on our cells to. It is just a matter of speed, China is probably just more efficient.

    • nashashmi 38 minutes ago

      What would they offer outside China? They still don’t have access to android.

      • makeitdouble 19 minutes ago

        I never remember the clear lines.

        I think they're bared from US distribution and PlayStore being Google is a no-go.

        But they're not banned in the EU nor SEA or anywhere outside the US really, and the open source part of android is also probably fair game.

        It feels like refocusing on the Chinese market only is a business move more than a limitation of what they can do.

        Perhaps Xiaomi is putting too much market pressure to make it viable to them ?

    • 082349872349872 2 hours ago

      thanks; that explains why the en and ru variants of https://developer.huawei.com/consumer/cn/develop/ have limited information.

  • csomar 2 hours ago

    > Huawei did try to export the last version of the OS – and even offered assistance to developers who coded for the platform and targeted offshore markets – without success.

    I wonder if they really tried or if they just suck too much. I thought about getting invested into the eco-system. The technical details of NEXT are quite interesting; however, the on-boarding is literal garbage. I still, to this day, can't sign up for a Huawei ID and I am currently located in Asia.

    • markus_zhang an hour ago

      Huawei or other Chinese companies are not particularly good at developer support. Maybe it's cultural or large corp or both. I have heard some bad stories about Ali cloud too. They are usable, but not particularly easy to use.

    • MichaelZuo 2 hours ago

      You can really see Huawei’s roots as a telecom vendor here.

      Their hardware, firmware, and core parts of the software are nearly flawless, at least compared to Apple/Google in 2024, but the moment you need something beyond the shipped product it becomes a hoop jumping exercise. And the documentation is much worse.

      • csomar an hour ago

        Indeed. I don't have much technical expertise in the kernel/OS space, but I wouldn't be surprised if the NEXT OS is better than Linux. On the other hand, their dev experience is akin to opening a router paper manual. There is an opportunity here but I am not sure how it can be unlocked.

        • rickdeckard 39 minutes ago

          > I wouldn't be surprised if the NEXT OS is better than Linux.

          I wouldn't be surprised if it's full of shortcuts with privilege escalations or contradicting exceptions.

          Not because it's Huawei, but because it's a single company developing BOTH the Operating System and the hardware it is supposed to be deployed in.

          When it comes to meeting a production deadline of a product, the pressure to apply a quick workaround is much much higher than the pressure to follow a structured process from whatever platform-team.

          Source: I worked in lots of companies which at some point tried to establish various kinds of frameworks, just to be forced to break them again in order to ship on-time...

          • forgotpwd16 16 minutes ago

            >it's a single company developing BOTH the Operating System and the hardware it is supposed to be deployed in

            That's what Apple has been doing for nearly 20 years now.

  • pkphilip 24 minutes ago

    I think it is good that we have a non-Google, non-Apple OS for mobile phones out there though I am guessing that the surveillance state will be in full operation in Harmony OS as well.

    • philistine 15 minutes ago

      The reason Huawei has a distinct non-Google Android flavour poisons the whole endeavour. Huawei is registered on the US Entity List.

      You can have the surveillance gulag of Google, or the surveillance gulag of the CCP. Pick your poison.

      • throwaway918299 4 minutes ago

        I am way too much of a small fry for the CCP to give a single fuck about me.

        Google, on the other hand, can have a massive influence on my day to day life.

      • SapporoChris 8 minutes ago

        https://grapheneos.org/ Which has it's own set of issues, but there are choices.

  • DeathArrow 2 hours ago

    >Huawei hopes to bring its OS to PCs, too. Last month the chair of the Chinese giant's consumer business group, Yu Chengdong, revealed it would no longer run Windows on its future machines, but Harmony OS instead

    That is very interesting. And considering that Harmony OS is not based on Android and Linux, I would be curious to see it running on a PC.

  • ak_111 34 minutes ago

    I wonder the cost to Microsoft if there is a rigorous political effort by the CCP to move all Chinese desktop consumption away from Windows and Office Suite to open source (local) alternatives.

    • jokoon 12 minutes ago

      That's a cost to microsoft, sure, but probably a much bigger cost to china.

      I like Linux, but porting a country's software on linux is no trivial task.

  • maelito 2 hours ago

    The more incompatible mobile OSes, the more the Web will come back. Cool.

  • p0w3n3d 2 hours ago

    > Huawei makes divorce from Android official

    What do I read as a non-native speaker?

    > Now you can divorce easily using Android phone from Huawei

    • fader 37 minutes ago

      "Divorce" here means "separate entirely". So

      > Huawei makes divorce from Android official means "Huawei has officially separated from Android and will no longer be using it in any way".

    • amelius an hour ago

      The spyware in Chinese phones can make divorce easier, yes.

      • Ygg2 an hour ago

        As opposed to US spyware?

        • nashashmi 34 minutes ago

          No such thing. Instead we have corporate America spyware. And America using court power to access corporate spyware data.

          You see this way America never gets spyware status. Neither does America get powerful enough that its backers become afraid of America.

        • dartos an hour ago

          Yeah well if you’re in the US you can’t really dodge US spyware, but you can dodge Chinese spyware.

          Carve out your sovereignty where you can, yknow?

          • okasaki 38 minutes ago

            If you're in the US you should be dodging US spyware not Chinese spyware, since you're living under US power and laws.

  • dragonelite an hour ago

    I would be more interested in a OpenHarmony Desktop version. If it picks up on mainland and Asia in general it would be a proper 3rd desktop OS.

    • komali2 an hour ago

      3rd desktop os? There are many more than 2 desktop oss already, am I misunderstanding you?

      • wongarsu 8 minutes ago

        There are only two kernel architectures in use though: Unix-derived and Windows. This could make for a very different new entry

      • moe_sc 36 minutes ago

        I guess they mean proper as in significant marketshare.

  • DeathArrow 3 hours ago

    The os seems to be kind of open source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenHarmony

    • markus_zhang 2 hours ago

      From my understanding OpenHarmony is different from Harmony NEXT. The later is proprietary.

      • Philpax 2 hours ago

        I believe Harmony NEXT is built on top of OpenHarmony?

  • 0xCAP 3 hours ago

    Very interesting wikipedia info:

    Written in: C, C++, JavaScript, ArkTS, Cangjie,[1] Rust, Assembly language and others

  • kotaKat 28 minutes ago

    Hey, Tim Sweeney now has a third platform he can put the Epic Games Store and Fortnite on!

    ... except I bet we'll never see either of those come to HarmonyOS.

    • spacebanana7 17 minutes ago

      His friends at Tencent might have the desire and capability to do so.

      If I were a CCP official I'd even relax some video game regulations when played on HarmonyOS to increase adoption. Under the guise of it having more 'safety' features or something like that.

  • poszlem an hour ago

    There is a saying in Eastern Europe that the biggest driver of innovation is American sanctions. This seems to be the case here.

  • methuselah_in 2 hours ago

    Also before they have something that's code was readable and people can see what the hell backdoors they have put. Now it's home run for surveillance

    • vachina 2 hours ago

      At least now I can choose who to spy on me.

      • bogwog an hour ago

        You mean that now you can choose who to give your data to for free.

        Everyone is spying on you.

    • jajko 2 hours ago

      I'd say that if you were worried before that on Chinese phones running Android there is something malicious but having some open source variant somewhere was protecting you somehow... you weren't paying much attention in this space for last decade+

    • peoplefromibiza 2 hours ago

      exactly how we can read the MacOS, Windows and all the Google apps code that are bundled with virtually every Android phone, right?

      • ChocolateGod 2 hours ago

        If you live in the west and criticise your government, nothing happens. If you live in China and criticise your government, even in private, you can go missing or end up in a camp

        • snapcaster an hour ago

          This is very over simplified and glossing over a huge amount of political repression that happens in the west just because it's more sophisticated. Don't fool yourself into thinking you're free because you're not in China. You would realize this the second you go against any powerful interests

        • FooBarWidget 32 minutes ago

          Try telling that to all those people punished for protesting against Gaza genocide. Not to mention Julian Assange.

          • ChocolateGod 14 minutes ago

            Julian Assange was wanted for publishing confidential documents, not speaking out against the government.

          • bsaul 9 minutes ago

            Still nothing compared to china. But nice try.

      • wiseowise 2 hours ago

        Exactly how we can read source of Linux distros, GrapheneOS and multitude of other security focused Android forks, right.

  • methuselah_in 2 hours ago

    So you are telling below you have nothing running linux? Lol