23 comments

  • _def 9 months ago

    > During a trip to the United States, Dr Masaichi brought along some of his prized tattooed skins in a suitcase. In a bizarre twist of fate, the suitcase was stolen while he was in Chicago. The fate of those tattooed skins remains a mystery to this day, with the thief likely unaware of the unique—and eerie—contents of the suitcase.

    Imagine stealing a suitcase only to find it filled with tattooed human skin. Yikes.

  • crazygringo 9 months ago

    To me, the photos of the skin "splayed" in a large frame feel highly disturbing.

    While the photo of the skin wrapped onto a mannequin seems not just entirely tasteful, but beautiful even.

    It's the same thing, but preserving the shape of the human body somehow makes it feel so much more respectful. I never would have guessed that would make any difference, since I'm aware of it being the same cadaver skin in both cases.

  • dendrite9 9 months ago

    My partner and I listen to a podcast about tattoos and history called Beneath the Skin on long drives. One of the hosts, Matt Lodder has made a career studying tattooing. As an outsider I didn't expect it to be as interesting as it is and they provide an interesting look at people and history.

    His book: https://harpercollins.co.uk/products/painted-people-humanity...

  • climb_stealth 9 months ago

    The article mentions he has two methods of preserving. Wet and dry. But then only explains the dry one. :/

    How does the wet preservation work?

    • dlkmp 9 months ago

      I also found that very frustrating. It's probably the method required to stretch the skin over a tailor's dummy like in that one photo.

    • iancmceachern 9 months ago

      Goo, they keep it in goo

      • climb_stealth 9 months ago

        That's what I was wondering. Floating in formaldehyde...

  • DeathArrow 9 months ago

    I've reached the weird part of the Internet, it seems.

  • yapyap 9 months ago

    My god I’m aware that for people who work with dead people all the time this may be less shocking but just ripping off the biggest organ off a dead person seems like it’s in rather poor taste IMO

  • wiradikusuma 9 months ago

    How old are his, ehm, potential collections when they made the deal?

    I can't imagine him making a deal with some 20-somethings and waiting 60 years to reap the fruit.

    Or maybe he "accelerated" the process?

    • marginalia_nu 9 months ago

      To be fair, being a lifetime gangster tends to be bad for your life expectancy.

  • p0w3n3d 9 months ago

    There's a movie about it Louis De Funes played in